1988
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90042-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indivisible labor, lotteries and equilibrium

Abstract: This paper considers an economy where labor is indivifible and agents are identical Although the discontinuity in labor supply at the individual leve! disappears as a result of aggregation, it is shown that indivisible labor has strong consequences for the aggregate behavior of ~he economy. It is also shown that optimal allocations involve lotteries over employmem and cor~umption. *I am indebted to Ed Prescott for his guidance. I ha~,e benefited from conversatio~ with John Geaneakoplos. Vittorio Grilii, Rol:er… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
736
1
13

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 982 publications
(762 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(2 reference statements)
12
736
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…13 The indivisible labor assumption has attracted substantial attention recently. See, for example, Mulligan (2001), and Krusell, Mukoyama, Rogerson, andSahin (2008, 2009 15 The larger is the greater is the household's chance of nding a job.…”
Section: Ecb Working Paper Series No 1202mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The indivisible labor assumption has attracted substantial attention recently. See, for example, Mulligan (2001), and Krusell, Mukoyama, Rogerson, andSahin (2008, 2009 15 The larger is the greater is the household's chance of nding a job.…”
Section: Ecb Working Paper Series No 1202mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adding this constraint is meant to capture the idea that the production process has important nonconvexities of fixed costs that may make varying the number of employed workers more efficient than varying hours per worker. As originally shown by Rogerson (1988), in the equilibrium of this model, individuals will be randomly assigned to employment or unemployment in each period, with consumption insurance against the possibility of unemployment. Thus this model generates fluctuations in the number of employed workers over cycle.…”
Section: The Indivisible Labor Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elle suggère au minimum la nécessité de développer un cadre d'analyse walrassien généralisé qui permettrait d'expliquer la variation des personnes-heures de travail au cours du cycle économique en termes de personnes plutôt qu'en termes d'heures de travail. Certaines études théoriques récentes (Rogerson 1988) sur l'indivisibilité des heures de travail ont permis d'accomplir des progrès en ce sens.…”
Section: Résultats Empiriques Des Modèles Supposant La Séparabilité Iunclassified