2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11577-004-0037-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individuelle und kontextuelle Determinanten der Teilhabe an Sozialkapital

Abstract: Zusammenfassung: In diesem Beitrag fragen wir nach Bedingungen, welche die Beteiligung in Freiwilligenorganisationen als Horte sozialen Kapitals beeinflussen. Neben individuellen Merkmalen stehen dabei vor allem die politischen, gesellschaftlichen und ökonomischen Rahmenbedingungen individueller Wahlhandlungen im Mittelpunkt des analytischen Interesses. Die Einflüsse der Individual-und der Kontextebene werden simultan in unterschiedlichen Mehrebenenmodellen geschätzt. Es wird deutlich, dass sich Mitgliedschaft… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, this should raise the value of the social appreciation of voluntary participation for members. On the other hand, the lower anonymity and the accompanying possibilities of sanctioning noncommitment (free‐riding becomes more costly) lead to the expectation of higher voluntary commitment (Bühlmann & Freitag, 2007). The present results indicate that growth‐oriented efforts of sports clubs have contra‐productive effects on volunteering and can further weaken the willingness to volunteer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, this should raise the value of the social appreciation of voluntary participation for members. On the other hand, the lower anonymity and the accompanying possibilities of sanctioning noncommitment (free‐riding becomes more costly) lead to the expectation of higher voluntary commitment (Bühlmann & Freitag, 2007). The present results indicate that growth‐oriented efforts of sports clubs have contra‐productive effects on volunteering and can further weaken the willingness to volunteer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The status of volunteering manifests in, for example, the measures and strategic planning to promote and support volunteering in the club as well as in material and nonmaterial incentives. The amount of voluntary engagement in sports club and its valuation may vary with size, goals or settlement structure (rural vs. urban) (Bühlmann & Freitag, 2007). For the size of a club, two opposing effects are conceivable: although the perceived social appreciation by other members should increase with the number of members (Erlinghagen, 2003), larger clubs reduce the social obligation to volunteer (decline in the community character, growth in anonymity) and encourage the free‐rider problem (e.g.…”
Section: Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further issue that must be considered is the problem of what is known as ‘reverse causation’ (Whiteley, 2000, p. 459). Our analyses are based on the assumption that the stock of social capital influences the unemployment rates in a given region and not vice versa (Bühlmann and Freitag, 2004, p. 332). Following Whiteley (2000), we address this issue by incorporating a time lag between the cause ‘social capital’ and its effect ‘unemployment rates’.…”
Section: Method Data and Operationalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to individual incentive and expectation structures, organizational factors such as involvement in the club, club memberships of one's own children, the perceived club climate, staff management, the reputation of the club, or the accumulated human and social capital obviously play a role in whether, to what extent and in what form members volunteer in the sports club (Flatau, 2009 ; Dwyer et al, 2013 ; Schlesinger et al, 2013 , 2014 ; Egli et al, 2014 ; Malinen and Harju, 2017 ; Swierzy et al, 2018 ; Wicker et al, 2018 ). As a third level, contextual factors such as political, social or economic conditions should also be considered to explain individual volunteering and related gender differences in the context of a multilevel analysis (Bühlmann and Freitag, 2004 , 2007 ). These analyses should not rely on quantitative methods alone, but should integrate qualitative methods in order to explain statistical findings comprehensively (Kelle, 2007 ) and to understand the mechanisms of reproduction of social inequality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%