2013
DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individuation Moderates Impressions of Conflicting Categories for Slower Processors

Abstract: We investigated individuation – attribute-based impressions associated with each unique individual rather than their categorical membership – as a moderator of impressions formed when slower versus faster processors encounter conflicting social category conjunctions. Descriptions of incongruent (e.g., female bricklayer), but not congruent category conjunctions (e.g., female nurse) were moderated by individuation in the application of emergent attributes (novel attributes associated exclusively with the categor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuation was measured through the following items: “How much do you view the immigrants described above as …” (1 = group members, 7 = individuals); “To what extent do you think the immigrants described above are typical immigrants” (1 = not at all, 7 = very much); “How similar are the immigrants described above to other members of the same group?” (1 = not at all similar, 7 = very similar; Hutter et al, ). Items 2 and 3 were reversed‐coded, such that higher scores on each item represented greater individuation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Individuation was measured through the following items: “How much do you view the immigrants described above as …” (1 = group members, 7 = individuals); “To what extent do you think the immigrants described above are typical immigrants” (1 = not at all, 7 = very much); “How similar are the immigrants described above to other members of the same group?” (1 = not at all similar, 7 = very similar; Hutter et al, ). Items 2 and 3 were reversed‐coded, such that higher scores on each item represented greater individuation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For instance, Hutter and Crisp () showed that, after thinking about stereotype‐inconsistent versus stereotype‐consistent category combinations (a female vs. male mechanic ; an Oxford‐educated bricklayer vs. art critic ), participants used fewer stereotypic and more novel attributes to describe the targets. This generative outcome is due to a shift from a heuristic, categorical mode of impression formation to a more individuated one (Hutter & Crisp, ; Hutter, Crisp, Humphreys, Waters, & Moffitt, ; Hutter, Wood, & Turner, ).…”
Section: The Effects Of Multiple Categorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…exposure to well-liked or positive atypical exemplars from the media can lead to greater acknowledgement of discrimination in society against other members of the group (Bodenhausen, Schwartz, Bless, & Wanke, 1995) and reduced endorsement of stereotypes (Ramasubramanian, 2011). In addition, when forming impressions of individuals in counterstereotypic occupations, people rely less on stereotypes and instead engage in individuation (Hutter & Crisp, 2005;Hutter, Wood, & Turner, 2013).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing from Hutter et al (2013), participants were asked to indicate "How much do they view the target described above as . .…”
Section: Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%