“…For instance, Hutter and Crisp () showed that, after thinking about stereotype‐inconsistent versus stereotype‐consistent category combinations (a female vs. male mechanic ; an Oxford‐educated bricklayer vs. art critic ), participants used fewer stereotypic and more novel attributes to describe the targets. This generative outcome is due to a shift from a heuristic, categorical mode of impression formation to a more individuated one (Hutter & Crisp, ; Hutter, Crisp, Humphreys, Waters, & Moffitt, ; Hutter, Wood, & Turner, ).…”