2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individually tuned theta HD-tACS improves spatial performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also reports of null and state-dependent effects of frontal lobe stimulation on arithmetic performance. Left PFC anodal tDCS or alpha tACS did not affect learning novel arithmetic procedures and facts ( Mosbacher et al, 2021 ), while concurrent right MFG and left IPS individually tuned HD theta tACS did not improve one-digit addition and two-digit subtraction task performance ( Zhang et al, 2022 ). Interestingly, bilateral PFC full-spectrum tRNS failed to enhance the performance of a calculation prodigy in a complex multiplication task and reduced task accuracy of postgraduate students with highly standardized mathematics scores in simplified multiplication problems, indicating ineffective or deleterious effects for individuals with already high-performing arithmetic functioning ( Krause et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are also reports of null and state-dependent effects of frontal lobe stimulation on arithmetic performance. Left PFC anodal tDCS or alpha tACS did not affect learning novel arithmetic procedures and facts ( Mosbacher et al, 2021 ), while concurrent right MFG and left IPS individually tuned HD theta tACS did not improve one-digit addition and two-digit subtraction task performance ( Zhang et al, 2022 ). Interestingly, bilateral PFC full-spectrum tRNS failed to enhance the performance of a calculation prodigy in a complex multiplication task and reduced task accuracy of postgraduate students with highly standardized mathematics scores in simplified multiplication problems, indicating ineffective or deleterious effects for individuals with already high-performing arithmetic functioning ( Krause et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…TES effects are limited not only to cortical areas beneath the electrodes but also to areas affected by the electric field generated between them, even reaching deep regions ( Bikson et al, 2010 ; Garcia-Sanz et al, 2022 ). Out of all the analyzed tES studies, only seven conducted electric field distribution simulations ( Klein et al, 2013a , b ; Artemenko et al, 2015 ; Grabner et al, 2015 ; Hauser et al, 2016 ; Luft et al, 2017 ; Bieck et al, 2018 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ). This means that in the remaining studies, the target areas may not be adequately reached and optimally stimulated, specifically during IPS stimulation, where the depth of current penetration is critical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An illustrative result, in this case, is the significant cognitive improvement found in age-related working memory deficits after “forcing” the coupling between brain regions using high-density transcranial alternating current stimulation (HD-tACS) ES. The dual-site HD-tACS was effective not only in reversing age-related cognitive deficits but also improved spatial task performance in adult human subjects ( Zhang et al, 2022 ). In other words, by “grossly” stimulating two different brain areas using a non-invasive procedure, Reinhart and Nguyen were able to frequency tune theta wave synchronization along the frontoparietal cortex ( Reinhart and Nguyen, 2019 ; Reinhart, 2022 ).…”
Section: Nps Meets the Coincidence-detection Framework: Driving The I...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The largest number of tACS studies (e.g., Jaušovec and Jaušovec, 2014 ; Jaušovec et al, 2014 ; Meiron and Lavidor, 2014 ; Vosskuhl et al, 2015 ; Alekseichuk et al, 2016 , 2017 ; Feurra et al, 2016 ; Santarnecchi et al, 2016 ; Kleinert et al, 2017 ; Borghini et al, 2018 ; Pahor and Jaušovec, 2018 ; Röhner et al, 2018 ; Tseng et al, 2018 ; Wolinski et al, 2018 ; Bender et al, 2019 ; Jones et al, 2019 ; Reinhart and Nguyen, 2019 ; Abellaneda-Pérez et al, 2020 ; Guo et al, 2021 ; Hosseinian et al, 2021 ; Sahu and Tseng, 2021 ; Biel et al, 2022 ; Draaisma et al, 2022 ; Hu et al, 2022 ; Soutschek et al, 2022 ; Zeng et al, 2022 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ; Grover et al, 2023 ; Rauh et al, 2023 ; Yang et al, 2023 ) targeted the theta band (4 Hz−7 Hz), which was proposed as the brain rhythm most strongly involved in encoding and maintaining the item sequences in WM (e.g., Lisman and Idiart, 1995 ; Jacob et al, 2018 ; Sauseng et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A corresponding improvement for the forward and backward recall tasks was replicated by Vosskuhl et al ( 2015 ) as a result of stimulating at individual theta frequency minus 1 Hz (i.e., presumably slowing down a key theta rhythm). Zhang et al ( 2022 ) observed no increase for the visuospatial forward recall task when slowing the theta down, but noted an increase when tuning stimulation precisely to individual theta frequency (at around 6 Hz). Null effects were reported also by Feurra et al ( 2016 ) for 5-Hz tACS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%