Individualistic Growth Response of Tundra Plant Species to Environmental Manipulations in the Field

Abstract

In undisturbed arctic tussock and wet meadow tundras we increased air temperature with a plastic greenhouse, increased nutrient availability by NPK fertilization, and decreased light intensity with shade cloth to determine the factors limiting growth of tundra plants. After 2 yr of these manipulations we measured growth of each major vascular species and one moss species. Each species showed a different pattern of growth response to alteration of light, air temperature, and nutrient regimes, indicating that no single factor limits growth of all species in these communities. Growth of canopy species (Betula nana. Ledum palustre, Carex bigelowii, and Eriophorum vaginatum) was reduced by experimental shading more than was growth of understory species (e.g., Vaccinium vitisidaea and Rubus chamaemorus). Species typical of nutrient-rich sites (Betula nana, Rubus chamaemorus, and Polygonum bistorta) generally responded more to nutrient addition than did species typical of nutrient-poor sites (e.g., Empetrum nigrum), although there were species characteristic of fertile sites (Salix pulchra) and infertile sites (Ledum palustre) which did not show this pattern of nutrient response. Species that grow in warm hollows between tussocks showed less growth in response to increased air temperature than did canopy species. We suggest that lack of a single common factor limiting growth of all species in tussock and wet meadow tundras implies that (I) each species is individualistically distributed, as described by the continuum model of community organization, (2) as a result of competition and/or distinct evolutionary histories, the growth of each species is limited by a different combination of environmental factors, and (3) production by individual species varies greatly from year to year, but production by the whole vegetation is more stable, because years that are favorable for growth of some species cause a compensatory decrease in growth of other species.

Effects of experimental warming and drought on biomass accumulation in a Mediterranean shrubland

“…In our case, the anticipated spring growth of E. multiflora in 2003 and 2004 in the warming plots only corresponded with increased elongation in 2004, a year with high water availability (Prieto 2007). At the stand level and after the 7 years of study, warming also tended to increase E. multiflora biomass accumulation but the change was statistically not significant, in part because of the low number of replicate plots and in part supporting the idea that biomass responses to warming are dependent on the availability of other needed resources such as water or nutrients (Chapin and Shaver 1985;Parsons et al 1994). …”

Differential responses of UK upland plants to nitrogen deposition

“…Many fertilizer experiments to date have applied N as either a single input or on only a few occasions, with virtually none applying NO $ − and NH % + in the proportions found in atmospheric wet deposition and many using unrealistically large doses (Chapin & Shaver, 1985 ;Field Studies Council, 1994).…”

Sustainable Development of the Boreal Forest: Interaction of Ecological, Social, and Business Feedbacks

“…The acquisition of water, nutrients, and light to support growth of one plant reduces availability of these resources to other plants (Tilman 1988), thereby stabilizing community productivity (Chapin and Shaver 1985). Similarly, animal populations cannot sustain exponential population growth indefinitely, because declining food supply (Malthus 1798) and predation (Hairston et al 1960, Oksanen 1990) reduce the rate of population increase.…”