Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.2753/mis0742-1222270410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Virtual Competence and Its Influence on Work Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…H5 is also supported by a current dataset. Prior studies also used computer self‐efficacy and social media self‐efficacy variables in different contexts (Chen, ; Wan, Compeau, & Haggerty, ; Y. Wang & Haggerty, ). For example, Wan et al () investigated the employee's e‐learning process with online job training and found that individual adopts several self‐regulated learning techniques resulting in numerous e‐learning outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…H5 is also supported by a current dataset. Prior studies also used computer self‐efficacy and social media self‐efficacy variables in different contexts (Chen, ; Wan, Compeau, & Haggerty, ; Y. Wang & Haggerty, ). For example, Wan et al () investigated the employee's e‐learning process with online job training and found that individual adopts several self‐regulated learning techniques resulting in numerous e‐learning outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H5 is also supported by a current dataset. Prior studies also used computer self-efficacy and social media self-efficacy variables in different contexts (Chen, 2017;Wan, Compeau, & Haggerty, 2012;Y. Wang & Haggerty, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of this study discussed next have to be interpreted in light of these limitations. One of the limitations of this replication study is that it uses a trimmed version of self-efficacy scale to minimize respondent fatigue (Wang and Haggerty, 2011). Though the trimmed version was approved by one of the authors of the original scale (Wang and Haggerty, 2011), it is possible that this change may have resulted in the non-significant effect of self-efficacy on perceived usefulness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEOU), as well as behavioral intention (BI) scales were adapted from Agarwal and Karahanna (2000). Self-efficacy was adapted from Wang and Haggerty (2011) and Agarwal and Karahanna (2000). All the adapted scales were adapted by changing item wording to focus on the context of Second Life.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical results and conclusions of these reports are not similar, but they agree that the concept of work is going to change significantly in the coming decades (Murawski and Bick, 2017). The macroeconomic scientists are still focusing on the numerical results and conclusions of their reports, while the consequences for the individual workers are often neglected (Wang and Haggerty, 2011). One of the most important questions is "Which digital competencies are required for employability in the digital age (Dubey and Gunasekaran, 2015)"?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%