2013
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.03084-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual N-Glycans Added at Intervals along the Stalk of the Nipah Virus G Protein Prevent Fusion but Do Not Block the Interaction with the Homologous F Protein

Abstract: The promotion of membrane fusion by most paramyxoviruses requires an interaction between the viral attachment and fusion (F) proteins to enable receptor binding by the former to trigger the activation of the latter for fusion. Numerous studies demonstrate that the F-interactive sites on the Newcastle disease virus (NDV) hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) and measles virus (MV) hemagglutinin (H) proteins reside entirely within the stalk regions of those proteins. Indeed, stalk residues of NDV HN and MV H that lik… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3A), indicating that these mutations had no significant effect on the first conformational change at the membranedistal portion of the NiV-G head. EphrinB2 binding to NiV-G also induces a roughly 2-fold increase in Mab45 binding to NiV-G (step 2), a step important for F triggering (28,30,31,34). We previously mapped the Mab45 epitope to region ␀6S4/␀1H1 (aa 177 to 194) at the base of the NiV-G head (28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3A), indicating that these mutations had no significant effect on the first conformational change at the membranedistal portion of the NiV-G head. EphrinB2 binding to NiV-G also induces a roughly 2-fold increase in Mab45 binding to NiV-G (step 2), a step important for F triggering (28,30,31,34). We previously mapped the Mab45 epitope to region ␀6S4/␀1H1 (aa 177 to 194) at the base of the NiV-G head (28).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it has been recently shown for several paramyxoviruses, including our report for NiV, that headless HN-H-G mutant proteins that carry an intact 4HB tetramerization domain are still able to trigger cell-cell fusion with their cognate F, suggesting that the stalk domain of the attachment protein has F-triggering features in common within the paramyxovirus family (25)(26)(27)(28). Although the crystal structures of the NiV-and HeV-G stalk domains are unsolved, several studies including site-directed mutagenesis, construction of NDV/NiV chimeras, and removal or addition of N-glycan moieties have suggested that NiV-and HeV-G stalk domains are important in modulating fusion and G oligomerization (18,(28)(29)(30)(31). We recently reported a three-step spatiotemporal mechanism of receptor-induced NiV membrane fusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although individual residues critical for F interaction and F activation have been determined for HN, H, or G stalk domains, it is becoming increasingly clear that F interaction with HN, H, or G stalk domain alone does not lead to F activation. Although these two aspects of the F triggering process are functionally linked, they can be separated by targeted mutagenesis (62,70,71; reviewed in reference 72).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All chimeric proteins contained a carboxy-terminal FLAG epitope (M74-G-FLAG ED, NiV-G-FLAG ED): M74-G ED consists of the amino acid (aa) residues 1 to 70 of NiV-G and aa 88 to 632 of M74-G, whereas NiV-G ED consists of aa 1 to 87 of M74-G and aa 71 to 602 of NiV-G. While the sequence of the NiV-G ED was derived from published data (25,26), the definitions of the NiV-G TD and CT as well as those of the M74-G ED, TD, and CT were based on the prediction of transmembrane regions by the online tool HMMTOP (www.enzim.hu/hmmtop/).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%