2014
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01561-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attachment Protein G of an African Bat Henipavirus Is Differentially Restricted in Chiropteran and Nonchiropteran Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, syncytium formation induced by the glycoproteins of the African henipavirus is restricted to chiropteran cells and not observed in cells of other mammalian species (33,46,47). This differential fusion activity has been traced back to the surface transport of the G protein, which was inefficient in all cells, but the inefficiency was less pronounced in chiropteran cells (28). The fusion activity of the batMuV glycoproteins differs from that of the African henipavirus, as it is not restricted to chiropteran cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, syncytium formation induced by the glycoproteins of the African henipavirus is restricted to chiropteran cells and not observed in cells of other mammalian species (33,46,47). This differential fusion activity has been traced back to the surface transport of the G protein, which was inefficient in all cells, but the inefficiency was less pronounced in chiropteran cells (28). The fusion activity of the batMuV glycoproteins differs from that of the African henipavirus, as it is not restricted to chiropteran cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…BHK-21, Vero76, and HeLa cells (kindly provided by A. Maisner) were maintained in Dulbecco's minimum essential medium (DMEM; Gibco) supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum (FCS; Biochrom). Chiropteran cells derived from different species and organs were used in this study: HypNi/1.1 (Hypsignathus monstrosus kidney cells), a clonal cell line produced from a mixed culture (HypNi/1) (27), HypLu/2 (Hypsignathus monstrosus lung cells, mixed culture) (28), and EidNi/41 cells (Eidolon helvum kidney cells, mixed culture) (29) were maintained in DMEM containing 10% FCS. All cells were cultivated in 75-cm 2 tissue culture flasks (Greiner Bio-One) at 37°C and 5% CO 2 .…”
Section: Sequence Homology Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All non-bat-derived cell lines were obtained from collaborators. The fruit bat cell lines were kindly provided by C. Drosten and M. A. Müller and have been described previously (27)(28)(29)(30)(31). All cell lines were grown in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C and 5% CO 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bat cell lines from the following species were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS: Eidolon helvum (kidney, EidNi/41; lung, EidLu/43), Epomops buettikoferi (kidney, EpoNi/22.1), Hypsignathus monstrosus (kidney, HypNi/1.1; lung, HypLu/2), Rousettus aegyptiacus (kidney, RoNi/7) and Pipistrellus spec. (kidney, PipNi/3) (Biesold et al, 2011;Hoffmann et al, 2013;Kr€ uger et al, 2014). HEK293T (Homo sapiens, kidney), BHK-21 (Mesocricetus auratus, kidney) and Vero76 cells (Cercopithecus aethiops, kidney) were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 5% FCS.…”
Section: Declaration Of Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%