1996
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1996.0020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual Functional Anatomy of Verb Generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that performing a grammatical manipulation with both verbs and pseudoverbs (compared to nouns and pseudonouns) reliably activated parts of the left rostral prefrontal cortex-in particular, in the left superior frontal gyrus, anterior and superior to regions damaged in a patient with selective difficulties in grammatical processing of verbs and pseudoverbs (Shapiro and Caramazza, 2003). Several previous PET studies have observed activation in this area for verb generation compared to silent rest (Crivello et al, 1995;Herholz et al, 1996;Warburton et al, 1996).…”
Section: Differences In Noun and Verb Processingmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that performing a grammatical manipulation with both verbs and pseudoverbs (compared to nouns and pseudonouns) reliably activated parts of the left rostral prefrontal cortex-in particular, in the left superior frontal gyrus, anterior and superior to regions damaged in a patient with selective difficulties in grammatical processing of verbs and pseudoverbs (Shapiro and Caramazza, 2003). Several previous PET studies have observed activation in this area for verb generation compared to silent rest (Crivello et al, 1995;Herholz et al, 1996;Warburton et al, 1996).…”
Section: Differences In Noun and Verb Processingmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This is not necessarily true in the case of verbs: because plural morphology for verbs is merely a formal reflex of a structural relationship between words in an utterance, verb and pseudoverb processing might not have engaged areas involved in representing meaning to the same extent as noun processing. Moreover, it seems unlikely that the left superior frontal gyrus, which was engaged selectively for verb and pseudoverb production in this experiment, is critical for the retrieval of semantic information (although we cannot rule out this possibility, especially in light of evidence that the same cortical area may be involved in silent verb generation to noun cues; Crivello et al, 1995;Herholz et al, 1996).…”
Section: Bilateral Processing Of Nounsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This type of variability, in the sets of cortical areas active across individuals, was once more found in our estimated sources of beta activity during the present visual attention and reasoning tasks: no single cortical area was seen to be active in all subjects. This variability is also met with in the unfortunately few fMRI studies that present individual data [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], some even during passive sensory stimulation [11,12]. Nevertheless, the concern with individual variability is now an important issue in fMRI research, but typically of a different kind, regarding the extent and amplitudes of task-related changes in given brain regions, frequently pre-selected 'regions of interest' (ROIs).…”
Section: Individual Variability In Active Association Areas and Functmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed methodological improvements center in the transformations of individual data (coordinates of peak changes) to a common 'space', previous to group spatial averaging [5][6][7]. In few cases we find the concern to preserve individual data and an explicit advice against group spatial averaging [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. The methods of analysis and interpretation in those studies would typically range from simple data tabulation to 'fuzzy clustering' [28] or 'multisubject network' [29,30] approaches.…”
Section: Individual Variability In Active Association Areas and Functmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation