2009
DOI: 10.1080/02699930802076893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in perceptual sensitivity and response bias in anxiety: Evidence from emotional faces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, it remains unclear when attention training procedures are effective and translate into therapeutic benefit detected by clinicians. Here, healthy comparison youth exhibited relatively stable happy bias (Frenkel, Lamy et al 2009), evidenced by correlations across visits; however, threat biases were uncorrelated. This result raises questions about stability of the threat bias.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Attention Training Toward Happy Facesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In particular, it remains unclear when attention training procedures are effective and translate into therapeutic benefit detected by clinicians. Here, healthy comparison youth exhibited relatively stable happy bias (Frenkel, Lamy et al 2009), evidenced by correlations across visits; however, threat biases were uncorrelated. This result raises questions about stability of the threat bias.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Attention Training Toward Happy Facesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In this sample, the non-inhibited adolescents displayed a large attention bias toward happy faces. Recent work shows that biases to happy stimuli may aid emotion regulation under stress (Frenkel et al, 2008; Wadlinger & Isaacowitz, 2008), suggesting that this may help protect children from negative developmental outcomes. A bias toward positive affect, rather than simply the absence of a threat bias, may act as an active mechanism for buffering early dispositions towards maladaptive social outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adolescence, we assessed their attention biases to both threatening (angry faces) and positive (happy faces) stimuli. Attention patterns to positive stimuli was assessed because recent work suggests that both behavioral inhibition and anxiety may be linked to perturbations in processing positive and negative stimuli (Bar-Haim et al, in press; Frenkel, Lamy, Algom, & Bar-Haim, 2008; Guyer et al, 2006; Pérez-Edgar et al, 2007). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a sense of “responsibility,” or self-agency, in a context of uncertainty (probabilistic outcomes) drives the neural system underlying appetitive motivation (i.e., nucleus accumbens) more strongly in temperamentally inhibited than noninhibited adolescents. One important next step will be to determine how the reward system interacts with fear circuitry among subjects characterized by behavioral inhibition and elevated anxiety (Frenkel, Lamy, Algom, & Bar-Haim, 2008). A further goal will be to examine behavioral inhibition and its underlying neural circuitry across development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%