1999
DOI: 10.3758/bf03214120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual differences in imagination inflation

Abstract: Garry, Manning, Loftus, and Sherman (1996) found that when adult subjects imagined childhood events, these events were subsequentlyjudged as more likely to have occurred than were not-imagined events, The authors termed this effect imagination inflation, We replicated the effect, using a novel set of Life Events Inventory events. Further, we tested whether the effect is related to four subject characteristics possibly associated with false memory creation. The extent to which subjects inflated judged likelihoo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
111
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(33 reference statements)
9
111
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulating an event has some effect on people's estimates of their future performance. The other point that we wish to make is that our results are consistent with the existing imagination inflation literature in that the imagined events showed a larger increase than the not-imagined items (e.g., Garry, Sharman, Wade, Hunt, & Smith, 2001;Heaps & Nash, 1999;Pezdek & Eddy, 2001). In the imagination inflation literature, the not-imagined items tended to increase, but this increase was typically smaller than the increase associated with the imagined items.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Simulating an event has some effect on people's estimates of their future performance. The other point that we wish to make is that our results are consistent with the existing imagination inflation literature in that the imagined events showed a larger increase than the not-imagined items (e.g., Garry, Sharman, Wade, Hunt, & Smith, 2001;Heaps & Nash, 1999;Pezdek & Eddy, 2001). In the imagination inflation literature, the not-imagined items tended to increase, but this increase was typically smaller than the increase associated with the imagined items.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…One of the more potent demonstrations of this phenomenon is imagination inflation (Garry, Manning, Loftus, & Sherman, 1996;Goff & Roediger, 1998;Heaps & Nash, 1999;Hyman & Billings, 1998;Paddock et al, 1998). In one such experiment, Garry et al (1996) had people rate the likelihoodthat they had experienced certain childhood events (e.g., getting stuck in a tree, finding a $10 bill, etc.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although imagination inflation has been demonstrated repeatedly (Garry et al, 1996;Goff & Roediger, 1998;Heaps & Nash, 1999;Paddock et al, 1999;Thomas & Loftus, 2002), the debate over the cause of the imagination inflation effect continues. Previous research suggests that imagination inflation can be accounted for by both the source-monitoring framework (Johnson, Hashtroudi, & Lindsay, 1993) and familiarity misattribution theory (Jacoby, Kelley, & Dywan, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a number of studies have reported that susceptibility to false memories appears to be correlated with dissociativity (e.g., Eisen and Carlson, 1998;Heaps and Nash, 1999;Wilson and French, 2006;Winograd et al, 1998). Dissociation can be thought of as a lack of integration between conscious awareness and mental activity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%