2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Individual and Population Benefits of Marine Reserves for Reef Sharks

Abstract: Highlights d Marine protected areas must extend over 10 km to protect site-attached reef sharks d More mobile reef shark species can be protected only if MPAs are over 50 km long d Annual fishing mortality was cut by 50% for all assessed species with 15-km MPAs d Atlantic MPAs should be 2.63 larger than Pacific MPAs to protect similar abundances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
69
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the variable periods of time over which these techniques are typically applied [3-6 months for satellite tags (Jaine et al, 2014;Braun et al, 2015), up to 10 years for internally implanted acoustic tags (Kessel et al, 2017), and potentially ongoing for photo-identification (Couturier et al, 2014)] provide insight into the conservation needs of this species over a range of temporal scales. Collectively, these spatiotemporal data can be used to develop scientifically informed management and conservation strategies for the species [e.g., Marine Protected Areas (MPAs); Germanov and Marshall, 2014;Peel et al, 2019b;Dwyer et al, 2020], and guide future research and monitoring efforts at both local scales (i.e., at aggregation sites and within populations), and more broadly throughout the range of M. alfredi.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the variable periods of time over which these techniques are typically applied [3-6 months for satellite tags (Jaine et al, 2014;Braun et al, 2015), up to 10 years for internally implanted acoustic tags (Kessel et al, 2017), and potentially ongoing for photo-identification (Couturier et al, 2014)] provide insight into the conservation needs of this species over a range of temporal scales. Collectively, these spatiotemporal data can be used to develop scientifically informed management and conservation strategies for the species [e.g., Marine Protected Areas (MPAs); Germanov and Marshall, 2014;Peel et al, 2019b;Dwyer et al, 2020], and guide future research and monitoring efforts at both local scales (i.e., at aggregation sites and within populations), and more broadly throughout the range of M. alfredi.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marine protected areas (MPAs) are increasingly established around the world to protect biodiversity, but the degree to which they can help conserve mobile species remains contentious. Highly mobile and widely ranging species pose a considerable challenge for spatial management as protection across ranges of hundreds to thousands of kilometres is often impractical, while protecting too small an area or failing to protect key habitats may be ineffectual (see Dunn et al, 2019;Dwyer et al, 2020). To assess the effectiveness of spatial management or habitat protection, it is necessary to have a good understanding of residency, habitat use and movement scale (Cooke, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal protection was reached at lower numbers of protected reefs when more suitable reefs were protected instead of poorly suitable ones. The demographic effect of protecting less suitable habitat in our simulations was a decreased expected longevity, which has already been recognized as a pervasive problem in shark conservation (Dwyer et al., 2019, 2020). Despite the capacity of high‐quality habitats to offset reduction of life expectancy and its variability, gains were marginal when compared with the number of breeding years lost to fishing, even for the most reef‐associated species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%