2018
DOI: 10.1130/g40161.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect estimation of bedload flux from modern sand-bed rivers and ancient fluvial strata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods complement traditional geochemical tracers (Weltje & von Eynatten, ), enhancing available methods for reconstructing sediment source areas and providing new constraints on paleosediment flux estimates. Detrital zircon studies provide an independent line of evidence for sediment flux estimates that compliment reconstructions achieved from deposit texture (Mahon & McElroy, ) or isopach reconstruction (Allen et al, ). Combining sediment provenance with other attributes measured from stratigraphic sections will help reduce uncertainty associated with nonunique solutions.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…These methods complement traditional geochemical tracers (Weltje & von Eynatten, ), enhancing available methods for reconstructing sediment source areas and providing new constraints on paleosediment flux estimates. Detrital zircon studies provide an independent line of evidence for sediment flux estimates that compliment reconstructions achieved from deposit texture (Mahon & McElroy, ) or isopach reconstruction (Allen et al, ). Combining sediment provenance with other attributes measured from stratigraphic sections will help reduce uncertainty associated with nonunique solutions.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This empirical relationship predicts relatively accurately the bankfull geometry of vegetated rivers (Figure ). Similar empirical relationships are often used to infer paleohydraulic conditions from fluvial deposits on Earth (e.g., Mahon & McElroy, ) and Mars (e.g., Jacobsen & Burr, ). However, the degree to which such relationships may be applied to unvegetated systems, such as pre‐Silurian (e.g., Eriksson et al, ; Mukhopadhyay et al, ) or Martian (e.g., Jacobsen & Burr, ) rivers, is not well understood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bank‐strengthening grain sizes can be estimated by inspection of fine intervals and fed into a bank‐cohesion model (equations –). Paleo‐channel width can then be estimated by iteratively solving equation , using the inferred W / h combined with estimates of paleo‐bed slope (e.g., from bed stress estimates, bed grain size, and flow depth; Lynds et al, ; Trampush et al, ; Mahon & McElroy, ; Figure ). For example, consider a putative ancient channel‐bed deposit from an Amargosa‐like river (Ielpi, ), with grain sizes of ~100 μm and that contains ~1‐m‐tall bar forms and current ripples with wavelengths of ~11 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two modern rivers representing end‐member braided and meandering planforms, the North Loup River (Nebraska, USA) and Trinity River (Texas, USA), are used for comparisons in this study. The North Loup River is a sand‐bed braided river that has been used before as a modern analogue to ancient fluvial strata (Mohrig et al , 2000; Mahon & McElroy, 2018). The North Loup River represents a reasonable analogue to understand bar and bedform processes occurring in the formative channels of the Ruby Ranch Member, because widths and depths are similar.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%