“…While we found evidence of significant direct and/or indirect effects of climate upon the abundance of all the species tested, the varyingly reduced SEM R 2 values reflect additional ecological processes that very well may further contribute toward explaining the patterns of abundance of these species (Shipley, ), as well as, perhaps, the relative rarity of the 46 other species observed during the study. For example, prey availability determines patterns of avian abundance (Holmes, ; Jones, Doran, & Holmes, ) as do predators (DeGregorio, Westervelt, Weatherhead, & Sperry, ; Sherry et al, ; Thompson, ). Competition is also a well‐known determinant of species distributions (Freeman & Montgomery, ; Martin, , ), especially along environmental gradients (Jankowski, Robinson, & Levey, ; Terborgh, ) and among conspecifics (Able & Noon, ; Srinivasan, Elsen, Tingley, & Wilcove, ).…”