2019
DOI: 10.1111/imj.14399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indigenous stroke care: differences, challenges and a need for change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing conclusions regarding guideline-directed treatment with intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular clot retrieval is problematic due to the lack of studies designed to specifically address this question. However, from the studies included in this review, there was clear evidence that Indigenous patients in Australia [40,42] , United States [65][66][67][68][69][70] and Canada [62] were less likely to receive treatment with thrombolysis or undergo endovascular clot retrieval in comparison to their non-Indigenous counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Drawing conclusions regarding guideline-directed treatment with intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular clot retrieval is problematic due to the lack of studies designed to specifically address this question. However, from the studies included in this review, there was clear evidence that Indigenous patients in Australia [40,42] , United States [65][66][67][68][69][70] and Canada [62] were less likely to receive treatment with thrombolysis or undergo endovascular clot retrieval in comparison to their non-Indigenous counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Regarding endovascular thrombectomy, several United States-based studies have similarly grouped Indigenous Peoples with other minority groups and shown racial disparities [69,70] . Attenello et al [63] separated racial groups when they examined the 2008 NIS database.…”
Section: Taiwanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Follow‐up rates were lower than expected, which meant missing values at three‐month follow‐up were greater than anticipated (Supporting Information, table 2). Recent investments in telehealth and explicit study design, including telehealth follow‐up and linkage with primary health care and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme data, would improve follow‐up 27 . Further, telehealth offers the added benefit of involving general practitioners, who can assist in promoting understanding of and adherence to secondary prevention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When observing the burden of stroke, cancer, and both diseases cumulatively, there is an unwarranted variation in the routine screening and clinical care of patients, with such procedures remaining suboptimal, particularly in LMICs [ 25 , 149 ]. Disparities within Australia most disadvantage the already at-risk and vulnerable populations of those who identify as Indigenous Australia, those living in regional and remote areas, and also those who have a lower socioeconomic status [ 150 , 151 , 152 ]. This is mirrored in the worldwide snapshot of stroke and cancer, whereby LMICs shoulder the majority of fatal stroke and cancer deaths and DALYs lost [ 153 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%