Indigenous engagement in health: lessons from Brazil, Chile, Australia and New Zealand

Abstract

Background: Given the persistence of Indigenous health inequities across national contexts, many countries have adopted strategies to improve the health of Indigenous peoples. Governmental recognition of the unique health needs of Indigenous populations is necessary for the development of targeted programs and policies to achieve universal health coverage. At the same time, the participation of Indigenous peoples in decision-making and program and policy design helps to ensure that barriers to health services are appropriately addressed and promotes the rights of Indigenous peoples to self-determination. Due to similar patterns of Indigenous health and health determinants across borders, there have been calls for greater global collaboration in this field. However, most international studies on Indigenous health policy link Anglo-settler democracies (Canada, Australia, Aotearoa/New Zealand and the United States), despite these countries representing a small fraction of the world's Indigenous people. Aim: This paper examines national-level policy in Australia, Brazil, Chile and New Zealand in relation to governmental recognition of differential Indigenous health needs and engagement with Indigenous peoples in health. The paper aims to examine how Indigenous health needs and engagement are addressed in national policy frameworks within each of the countries in order to contribute to the understanding of how to develop pro-equity policies within national health care systems. Methods: For each country, a review was undertaken of national policies and legislation to support engagement with, and participation of, Indigenous peoples in the identification of their health needs, development of programs and policies to address these needs and which demonstrate governmental recognition of differential Indigenous health needs. Government websites were searched as well as the following databases: Google, OpenGrey, CAB Direct, PubMed, Web of Science and WorldCat.

Strategies to Support Sustained Participant Engagement in an Oral Health Promotion Study for Indigenous Children and Their Families in Australia

“…Although there are complex social and political factors at play that impact on education and employment opportunities, adequate housing, and access to health services, this inequality is also partly attributed to the inability of existing oral health and other health services to meet the cultural needs of Indigenous communities [7]. Barriers to participation in health care services also stem from the profound and intergenerational effects of colonisation, which has resulted in many Indigenous peoples having an entrenched mistrust, from having endured poor treatment and racism over many years [8,9]. It has been recognised that more culturally appropriate child oral health promotion programs are needed [10].…”

Decolonizing health in Canada: A Manitoba first nation perspective

“…International literature on health inequities suggests the key to successful outcomes is held within communities who have taken control over their health, health services and systems [12,36]. Indigenous participation, engagement in health programming, policy development [37], structural transformation [38], and culturally appropriate healthcare, recognized as a political right [35] are specific tenets within those discourses of control.…”

Vision impairment and differential access to eye health services in Aotearoa New Zealand: protocol for a scoping review

“… 15 The health gap is persistent between Māori and non-Māori. 16 Chronic conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are more prevalent among Māori compared with other New Zealanders. 17 18 Māori have a higher need for renal replacement therapy 15 and a 30% higher risk of developing a cardiovascular event compared with European New Zealanders.…”

“… 17 18 Māori have a higher need for renal replacement therapy 15 and a 30% higher risk of developing a cardiovascular event compared with European New Zealanders. 19 15 16 17 18 15 …”