Indices on cryptocurrencies: an evaluation

Abstract

Several cryptocurrency (CC) indices track the dynamics of the rising CC sector, and soon ETFs will be issued on them. We conduct a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of the currently existing CC indices. As the CC sector is not yet consolidated, index issuers face the challenge of tracking the dynamics of a fast-growing sector that is under continuous transformation. We propose several criteria and various measures to compare the indices under review. Major differences between the indices lie in their weighting schemes, their coverage of CCs and the number of constituents, the level of transparency, and thus, their accuracy in mapping the dynamics of the CC sector. Our analysis reveals that simple market cap-weighted indices outperform their competitors. Interestingly, increasing the number of constituents does not automatically lead to a better fit of the CC sector. All codes are available on "Image missing".

Understanding the risks associated with wallets, depository services, trading, lending, and borrowing in the crypto space

“…Lending and borrowing in the cryptocurrency space involve counterparty risk, which refers to the potential default or failure of the other party involved in the transaction. For example, borrowers may not repay their loans, or lending platforms may become insolvent (Häusler and Xia, 2021;Hoang and Baur, 2021;Horky et al, 2022).…”

Crypto Market Betas: The Limits of Predictability and Hedging

“…The market index is a critical component in the vast majority of contemporary asset pricing models. However, there is an acute lack of consensus on which of the several crypto market indices is the best representative (Trimborn andHärdle 2018, Häusler andXia 2022). As it turns out, differences in the number of constituents, requirements on their liquidity and in the weighting scheme lead to dramatically different conclusions.…”