2008
DOI: 10.1590/s0104-11692008000400015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indicators of healthcare results: analysis of adverse events during hospital stays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
21
2
48

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(13 reference statements)
6
21
2
48
Order By: Relevance
“…The data analysis showed that 44% of the subjects When the occurrence of PUI and falls in the hospital studied were analyzed, it was found that these indicators were considered by 100% of the nurses as highly relevant to evaluate the quality of the nursing care, corroborating the literature (15)(16) . Other indicators considered by the nurses as highly relevant or relevant for the qualification of the care are intimately related to the daily nursing tasks, such as incidence of phlebitis, accidental extubation and incidence of non-compliance in the medication administration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The data analysis showed that 44% of the subjects When the occurrence of PUI and falls in the hospital studied were analyzed, it was found that these indicators were considered by 100% of the nurses as highly relevant to evaluate the quality of the nursing care, corroborating the literature (15)(16) . Other indicators considered by the nurses as highly relevant or relevant for the qualification of the care are intimately related to the daily nursing tasks, such as incidence of phlebitis, accidental extubation and incidence of non-compliance in the medication administration.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The incidence of adverse events in ICUs, semi intensive units and inpatient units of a private tertiary hospital with 250 beds in São Paulo (Brazil) was evaluated in 2006 21 . A total of 229 adverse events were reported during a period of 4 months; 21 (9.17%) of them were associated with the use of CVCs and included obstruction, extravasation, dislodgement, incorrect fixation, unplanned removal, bleeding, and clamping 21 .…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 229 adverse events were reported during a period of 4 months; 21 (9.17%) of them were associated with the use of CVCs and included obstruction, extravasation, dislodgement, incorrect fixation, unplanned removal, bleeding, and clamping 21 . In the present study, 45.16% of patients experienced adverse events, including catheter displacement, kinking, loss of fixation and loss of device, what is a high percentage of adverse events associated with CVC compared to the findings of Nascimento et al 21 .…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study conducted in the hospital environment, recording adverse events in relation to nasogastric tubes, central venous catheters, endotracheal tubes, medication errors and falls, found that those related to nasogastric tubes, represented 57.6% of the total, demonstrating a greater demand for attention by the nursing team in the handling and care of this device (21) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%