2017
DOI: 10.1144/geochem2015-396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indicator mineral and geochemical signatures associated with the Sisson W–Mo deposit, New Brunswick, Canada

Abstract: An indicator mineral and geochemical case study was carried out around the Sisson W–Mo deposit to test modern indicator mineral and analytical methods and document glacial and fluvial dispersal from a significant W–Mo source. Indicator minerals in the 0.25 – 2.0 mm non-ferromagnetic heavy mineral fraction of till and stream sediments include the primary ore minerals scheelite, wolframite and molybdenite, as well as chalcopyrite, joseite, native Bi, bismutite, bismuthinite, galena, sphalerite, arsenopyrite, pyr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future work should investigate the use of trace-element compositional analysis of epidote grains to assess terrane fertility, after the work of Plouffe et al [8] on porphyry systems. Fe-oxide minerals can indicate the incorporation of gossanous material into till [72] or the weathering of sulfide grains during transport or following deposition. Not all gossans will be found with associated mineralized sulfide bodies (i.e., the WIZ showing) but the fact that they indicate that a mineralized system existed at one point in time makes them an important exploration target.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future work should investigate the use of trace-element compositional analysis of epidote grains to assess terrane fertility, after the work of Plouffe et al [8] on porphyry systems. Fe-oxide minerals can indicate the incorporation of gossanous material into till [72] or the weathering of sulfide grains during transport or following deposition. Not all gossans will be found with associated mineralized sulfide bodies (i.e., the WIZ showing) but the fact that they indicate that a mineralized system existed at one point in time makes them an important exploration target.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density concentration of samples was carried out using a combination of wet screening and shaking table, followed by heavy liquid separation (methyl iodide) at 3.2 SG, acid-washing, and ferromagnetic separation to produce a coarse (250-2000 µm), nonferromagnetic HMC (>3.2 SG) fraction. This coarse fraction was visually examined, and indicator minerals were counted, with results reported by McClenaghan et al [40,41]. The archived by-product of sample processing was the nonferromagnetic, <250 µm HMC fraction that is the basis of our study.…”
Section: Sample Processingmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The train was defined by various combinations of W, Mo, As, Bi, Cu, F, Pb, and Sn contents in several different size fractions of till matrix [20,33,[35][36][37]. Till indicator mineral studies carried out by McClenaghan et al [20,[38][39][40][41] combined with stream-sediment indicator mineral data [21,41] indicate that the 250-2000 µm HMC fraction of sediment contains the ore minerals scheelite, wolframite, and molybdenite, along with sulfide and Bi-bearing minerals. Scheelite was found in till samples collected at least 10 km down ice of mineralization, whereas the other ore minerals were only found in till samples immediately overlying mineralization.…”
Section: Previous Surficial Geochemical and Indicator Mineral Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations