2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.04.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indications, techniques, and clinical outcomes of thoracic duct interventions in patients: a forgotten literature?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 1987, we have introduced an original access for sampling the thoracic duct lymph which works with no failure. Moreover, the ongoing studies in thoracic duct cannulation and lymphatic fl uid collection in animals [23] and humans [24] are performed over last years, thus allowing to take lymph samples and to perform lymph drainage, e.g., for in vivo T cell exhaustion in human patients [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1987, we have introduced an original access for sampling the thoracic duct lymph which works with no failure. Moreover, the ongoing studies in thoracic duct cannulation and lymphatic fl uid collection in animals [23] and humans [24] are performed over last years, thus allowing to take lymph samples and to perform lymph drainage, e.g., for in vivo T cell exhaustion in human patients [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This intervention requires judicious fluid and electrolyte replacement and can be complicated by infection and lymph leak. Another reason for the lack of interest in thoracic duct interventions is likely to be because the results from the studies in a wide range of acute diseases have been largely equivocal, most likely reflecting inferior and under‐powered clinical trial design . On the basis of this literature and the experimental evidence, it has been considered that equipoise still exists and that further studies are warranted.…”
Section: External Drainage Of Thoracic Duct Lymphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is hypothesized that diverting toxic gut‐lymph by external drainage of thoracic duct lymph during the first week will likely yield clinical benefits in severe and critical AP. Of possible concern with this approach is the risk of immunodepletion, but this does not occur until after 3–4 weeks of thoracic duct lymph drainage . It is now important to evaluate external drainage of thoracic duct lymph in the context of a randomized clinical trial to determine whether it can reduce the systemic inflammatory response, mitigate multiple organ dysfunctions, and improve clinical outcome in patients with severe and critical AP.…”
Section: External Drainage Of Thoracic Duct Lymphmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations