1996
DOI: 10.1016/0167-2789(95)00300-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indications of nonlinearity, intraindividual specificity and stability of human EEG: The unfolding dimension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The univariate case (ANOVA) tests the influence of one or more treatment effects upon the outcome of a single variable, for example, how the nonlinear correlation-dimension estimate b 0 [9] is affected by group, mental situation, and proband (cf. Section 4).…”
Section: Recapitulation Of the F-ratio Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The univariate case (ANOVA) tests the influence of one or more treatment effects upon the outcome of a single variable, for example, how the nonlinear correlation-dimension estimate b 0 [9] is affected by group, mental situation, and proband (cf. Section 4).…”
Section: Recapitulation Of the F-ratio Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, we have chosen to compare and contrast the so-called si-milarity approach [1,2] with the nonlinear unfolding dimension approach proposed recently [3,4]. Some progress concerning the stable intraindividual specificity of EEG time series has already been made by advanced linear methods on healthy individuals between the ages of circa 25-35 years.…”
Section: Scope Of the Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Casdagli et al, 1996;Schmid & Dünki, 1996;Vibe & Vesin, 1996] and the references therein). Estimating these quantities and making uneqivocal classifications can prove difficult and the method of surrogate data [Theiler et al, 1992] is often employed to provide some rigor and certainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%