1998
DOI: 10.1142/s0218127498000966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detecting Nonlinearity in Experimental Data

Abstract: The technique of surrogate data has been used as a method to test for membership of particular classes of linear systems. We suggest an obvious extension of this to classes of nonlinear parametric models and demonstrate our methods with respiratory data from sleeping human infants. Although our data are clearly distinct from the different classes of linear systems we are unable to distinguish between our data and surrogates generated by nonlinear models. Hence we conclude that human respiration is likely to be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the surrogate data generated by shuffling individual cycles within the time series, referred to as the cycle surrogate data, are useful for testing the determinism in the case of slow amplitude modulation. Referring to previous studies, 32,33 we postulate a null hypothesis that each cycle is independent of its adjacent cycles and that no determinism is visible in the pitch fluctuations of the time series. Under this null hypothesis, we generate a 20 cycle surrogate time series.…”
Section: Surrogate Data Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the surrogate data generated by shuffling individual cycles within the time series, referred to as the cycle surrogate data, are useful for testing the determinism in the case of slow amplitude modulation. Referring to previous studies, 32,33 we postulate a null hypothesis that each cycle is independent of its adjacent cycles and that no determinism is visible in the pitch fluctuations of the time series. Under this null hypothesis, we generate a 20 cycle surrogate time series.…”
Section: Surrogate Data Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…26,30 Nevertheless, we do not use this algorithm in this study. We instead apply the amplitude adjusted Fourier transform surrogate method 31 and the cycle surrogate method, 32,33 to evaluate the statistical significance of our estimates for the translation error in the Wayland test. On the basis of the extracted deterministic nature of the dynamic behavior, the availability of the nonlinear forecasting method, proposed by Sugihara and May, 34 is also discussed to predict the short-term dynamic behavior of the combustion instability from a practical viewpoint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is based on the well-known local-linear modeling methods described by Mees [2] and Sugihara and May [3]. Previously, Small and Judd advocated [4] and implemented [5] nonlinear radial basis modeling routines [6,7] as a form of surrogate hypothesis testing. The method we describe here is simpler and tests a more specific null hypothesis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It measures the freedom degree and complexity of the system. For the raw data and all data of φ F F ∈ , in the case of the same embedding dimension, the corresponding test results will be obviously significant [42]. Here, the correlation dimension is used as a test statistic to analyze the surface EMG signal.…”
Section: Study Of Surrogate Data Test Methods Based On Correlation Dimmentioning
confidence: 99%