1975
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1975.00021962006700020024x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indexes of Sulfur Deficiency in Alfalfa. II. Plant Analyses1

Abstract: Both soil and plant analysis are diagnostic tools used in identifying S deficiencies; however, soil tests evaluating soil S availability levels are not always successful and deficiencies must then be identified by plant analysis. In addition, the diagnostic tool must be correlated to crop responses under various growing conditions to be useful. Identification of S deficiency on alfalfa (Medinago saliva L) in southern Idaho permitted the collection of correlation data for both S soil tests and plant analyses. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be said however that it is desirable for cabbage plants to have a total N/S content ratio between 10 and 20(3). The inosoluble N/S content ratio changes to a smaller extent than the total N/S content ratio, because the fluctuation of nitrogen and sulfur in the non-protein fraction is greater than in the protein fraction (10). The insoluble N/S content ratio may thus be a more reliable guideline for diagnosing sulfur nutrition of plants than the total N/S content ratio(7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be said however that it is desirable for cabbage plants to have a total N/S content ratio between 10 and 20(3). The inosoluble N/S content ratio changes to a smaller extent than the total N/S content ratio, because the fluctuation of nitrogen and sulfur in the non-protein fraction is greater than in the protein fraction (10). The insoluble N/S content ratio may thus be a more reliable guideline for diagnosing sulfur nutrition of plants than the total N/S content ratio(7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another subsample was wet-ashed with a HCL0 4-HNO3 mixture. The digested solution was analyzed for P colorimetrically (4); K, Ca, Mg, Zn, Cu and Mn by atomic absorption spectrophotometry; and S turbidimetrically (13). All analyses are reported on a dry matter basis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plant samples were digested with HCIO, and HNO 3 , filtered, and Cu , Mn, Fe, Zn, Ca, Mg, and K concentrations determined in the filtrates with an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Isaac and Kerber, 1971); P concentrations were determined colorimetrically (Kitson and Mellon, 1944); and S concentrations were determined turbidimetrically (Westermann, 1975). Total N concentrations were determined by the Kjeldahl procedure (Bremner and Mulvaney, 1982).…”
Section: Plant Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%