2018
DOI: 10.1109/tcbb.2016.2613098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Index-Based Network Aligner of Protein-Protein Interaction Networks

Abstract: Network Alignment over graph-structured data has received considerable attention in many recent applications. Global network alignment tries to uniquely find the best mapping for a node in one network to only one node in another network. The mapping is performed according to some matching criteria that depend on the nature of data. In molecular biology, functional orthologs, protein complexes, and evolutionary conserved pathways are some examples of information uncovered by global network alignment. Current te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of SAlign and its variant, , are compared with prominent existing aligners on BioGRID (three network pairs) and HINT (five network pairs) datasets. Existing prominent techniques include HubAlign [ 1 ], ModuleAlign [ 7 ], NETAL [ 8 ], PROPER [ 9 ], IBNAL [ 10 ] and Magna++ [ 15 ]. The performance of IsoRank [ 16 ], PISwap [ 17 ], GHOST [ 18 ], PINALOG [ 19 ], L-GRALL [ 20 ], Great [ 21 ] and SPINAL [ 22 ] have been shown to be lower than most of the above mentioned algorithms, so we did not include these algorithms in our analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of SAlign and its variant, , are compared with prominent existing aligners on BioGRID (three network pairs) and HINT (five network pairs) datasets. Existing prominent techniques include HubAlign [ 1 ], ModuleAlign [ 7 ], NETAL [ 8 ], PROPER [ 9 ], IBNAL [ 10 ] and Magna++ [ 15 ]. The performance of IsoRank [ 16 ], PISwap [ 17 ], GHOST [ 18 ], PINALOG [ 19 ], L-GRALL [ 20 ], Great [ 21 ] and SPINAL [ 22 ] have been shown to be lower than most of the above mentioned algorithms, so we did not include these algorithms in our analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ModuleAlign develop a novel method for using topological information that is based on hierarchical clustering [ 7 ]. IBNAL develop a clique based index to measure the topology of the proteins [ 10 ]. NETAL and PROPER use local topological measures to calculate the topology [ 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… is a set of GO terms of protein u . Later, the normalized version of GOC was proposed by Elmsallati et al [17] . The NGOC is defined to be: where n is the total number of aligned proteins.…”
Section: Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IBNAL, proposed by Elmsallati et al [17] first divides the PPI network into two individual subsets and creates a Clique Degree Signature vector for each node in the subset of subordinate nodes to keep the number of cliques that the subordinate node connected. Then IBNAL indexes all subordinate nodes and cliques for accelerating the next step of alignment extraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each suite consists of three different datasets generated by different network synthesis models (i.e., DMC, DMR, and CG), where each dataset contains ten network families generated independently by a given synthesis model. Since the original release, NAPAbench has been widely used for evaluating the performance of various network alignment algorithms [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%