2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental Value of Subtended Myocardial Mass for Identifying FFR-Verified Ischemia Using Quantitative CT Angiography

Abstract: V is an independent determinant of an FFR ≤0.80. The mathematical index of V/MLA >4.16 assessed by coronary CTA shows better diagnostic performance for the detection of ischemia-producing lesions than CT-derived MLA alone or %APV and QCA parameters and was comparable to that of on-site CT-FFR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pressure loss across a stenosis is a function of resistance, whose components include morphologic factors (including stenosis entrance angle, orifice configuration, length of stenosis, exit angles) as well as physiologic factors such as flow and associated myocardial supply area (28). Recently, the incremental value of also considering the subtended myocardial mass for identifying FFR-verified ischemia was confirmed using quantitative CT angiography (29). Furthermore, as explicitly formulated in an editorial, the question arises "which of the two instruments for gauging stenosis, FFR or angiography, is at fault" (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure loss across a stenosis is a function of resistance, whose components include morphologic factors (including stenosis entrance angle, orifice configuration, length of stenosis, exit angles) as well as physiologic factors such as flow and associated myocardial supply area (28). Recently, the incremental value of also considering the subtended myocardial mass for identifying FFR-verified ischemia was confirmed using quantitative CT angiography (29). Furthermore, as explicitly formulated in an editorial, the question arises "which of the two instruments for gauging stenosis, FFR or angiography, is at fault" (30).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, functional assessment can be made using angiograms, including CTA measurements of FFR (FFR CT ), quantitative coronary angiogram FFR (FFR QCA ), quantitative flow ratio (QFR), and stenosis flow reserve (SFR). CT-FFR chiefly reflects the degree of stenosis but is also affected by the size of the coronary arteries 94 as well as the mass of ventricular myocardium subtended by the stenosis bearing vessel 95 and both these parameters can be accounted for by CT, which may make this parameter more meaningful.…”
Section: Plaque Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential reason for this fining may by the difference in subtended myocardial mass between the LAD and non‐LAD. In the previous studies using cardiac computed tomography, the LAD had a greater supplied myocardial mass than the non‐LAD, and the amount of subtended myocardial mass was an important factor to predict FFR ≤0.80 . In the territory of the LAD, the degree of vascular resistance decrease might be greater than the increase in the blood flow volume, owing to the smaller diameter of the artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%