2008 11th IEEE Workshop on Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits and Systems 2008
DOI: 10.1109/ddecs.2008.4538759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incremental SAT Instance Generation for SAT-based ATPG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finding a test pattern, however, is often more complex [33]. This is due to the stopping criterion of modern SAT solvers.…”
Section: A Sat-based Atpgmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finding a test pattern, however, is often more complex [33]. This is due to the stopping criterion of modern SAT solvers.…”
Section: A Sat-based Atpgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the classification, the CNF is completely discarded. Therefore, the circuit-to-CNF conversion has to be done for each single target fault and consumes a large part of the overall runtime as already stated in [26], [33].…”
Section: B Circuit-to-cnf Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [15] a detailed run time analysis of state-of-the-art SAT-based ATPG algorithms applied to industrial circuits is given. The two basic steps -SAT instance generation and solving -are compared with respect to their run time.…”
Section: Incremental Instance Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9], [10], [6], [3]) work on an instance representation in Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF), a new SAT instance has to be generated for each fault 1 . In [15], it was shown that the run time needed for instance generation is a significant part of the overall run time and often even dominates it. Especially CNFs of untestable faults can mostly be solved very easily, because in industrial circuits the reason for the conflict is often bounded locally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%