2014
DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the scale and adoption of population health interventions: experiences and perspectives of policy makers, practitioners, and researchers

Abstract: BackgroundDecisions to scale up population health interventions from small projects to wider state or national implementation is fundamental to maximising population-wide health improvements. The objectives of this study were to examine: i) how decisions to scale up interventions are currently made in practice; ii) the role that evidence plays in informing decisions to scale up interventions; and iii) the role policy makers, practitioners, and researchers play in this process.MethodsInterviews with an expert p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
132
0
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
132
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…17,18 The intervention needs to be proven effective and effect sizes should be relatively large, because a reduction in effectiveness should be expected after implementation in a less-controlled setting. Furthermore, the intervention should be adaptable and generalizable to various settings without compromising the fidelity of the program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,18 The intervention needs to be proven effective and effect sizes should be relatively large, because a reduction in effectiveness should be expected after implementation in a less-controlled setting. Furthermore, the intervention should be adaptable and generalizable to various settings without compromising the fidelity of the program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is rare for interventions to remain unchanged as they are scaled up, because of the need to adapt them to suit the local context and the organisational, financial and human resources available for scaling up. 4,6,10 These adaptations may reduce effectiveness, but they can improve acceptability and efficiency, highlighting the importance of measuring intervention effectiveness throughout the scaling up process. Reach and adoption are at the heart of scalability.…”
Section: Monitor Performance and Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The guide was developed using a systematic review of scaling up models and methods 3 , and a two-round Delphi process with a sample of senior policy makers, practitioners and researchers actively involved in scaling up processes. 2,10 It was developed as a practical guide to assist health policy makers, health practitioners, and others with responsibility for scaling up effective population health interventions. 9 The guide is divided into four steps: scalability assessment, developing a scaling up plan, preparing for scaling up, and scaling up the intervention.…”
Section: Guide To Scaling Upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite recent interest with “population health” [25], population average estimates are off-purpose for most RCTs, where the goal is to understand how individual patients respond to treatment (e.g., [26]). In contrast to GEE and GLS, random-coefficients models [24] are well-suited for characterizing individual patient response, because they offer estimates of longitudinal response trajectories of individual patients and of the average patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%