2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2015.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the predictive power of geostatistical reservoir models by integration of geological constraints from stratigraphic forward modeling

Abstract:  Stratigraphic Forward Model (SFM) provides channel body volumetrics at basin scale  Basin-scale constraints from the SFM were integrated into reservoir models  Uncertainty of basin-fill parameters was propagated to reserve estimation  Inference of basin-fill parameters from reservoir data reduced their uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these results are promising, they are very computationally intensive and may not match dense data sets as provided for instance by seismic data or dense drilling campaigns. Therefore, several studies propose to indirectly integrate information from forward stratigraphic models in static geocellular models (Sacchi et al, 2016). One of the most common methodologies uses forward stratigraphic methods to generate training images for Multiple Point Statistics (MPS) simulation algorithms (e.g., Harris et al (2011)).…”
Section: Cost Computation From a Training Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these results are promising, they are very computationally intensive and may not match dense data sets as provided for instance by seismic data or dense drilling campaigns. Therefore, several studies propose to indirectly integrate information from forward stratigraphic models in static geocellular models (Sacchi et al, 2016). One of the most common methodologies uses forward stratigraphic methods to generate training images for Multiple Point Statistics (MPS) simulation algorithms (e.g., Harris et al (2011)).…”
Section: Cost Computation From a Training Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, stratigraphic-forward modeling has been used to incorporate quantitative, process-based geologic information to constrain reservoir modeling. For example, Sacchi et al (2016) used a depth-averaged flow in the 2-D horizontal plane, basin-scale stratigraphic-forward model called SimClast Weltje, 2008, 2012) to simulate fluviodeltaic stratigraphic evolution and create a 3-D probability distribution of facies proportions. This probability cube was used as additional input for a geostatistical reservoir model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static records include geophysical surveys, well logs and geological data [6] whilst dynamic information provides evidence of the interactions between the static model and the fluid over time. This approach delivers an appropriate means to deal with incomplete datasets [7,8] and has been the standard in oil and gas reservoir modeling for at least three decades [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static reservoir modeling is frequently coupled with complementary geophysical techniques. This is because drilling data is characterized by high vertical resolution-low horizontal resolution, whereas geophysical soundings present the opposite pattern [8]. In the case of the former, well logs provide a quantitative method to assess near-borehole petrophysical signatures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%