The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014jd021504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing the credibility of regional climate simulations by introducing subgrid‐scale cloud‐radiation interactions

Abstract: The radiation schemes in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model have previously not accounted for the presence of subgrid-scale cumulus clouds, thereby resulting in unattenuated shortwave radiation, which can lead to overly energetic convection and overpredicted surface precipitation. This deficiency can become problematic when applying WRF as a regional climate model (RCM). Therefore, modifications were made to the WRF model to allow the Kain-Fritsch (KF) convective parameterization to provide subgr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, simulations with correct temperatures, as MPE-F, or even too warm, as MPE-D, produce excessive precipitation. It is known that the Kain-Fritsch cumulus scheme overestimates convective precipitation because it does not represent the radiative effect of unresolved cumulus clouds (Herwehe et al 2014;Alapaty et al 2012). Other convection schemes, such as BMJ and GD, could be affected by similar problems, and these would be an important contribution to precipitation overestimation in summer.…”
Section: Temperature and Precipitation Bias Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, simulations with correct temperatures, as MPE-F, or even too warm, as MPE-D, produce excessive precipitation. It is known that the Kain-Fritsch cumulus scheme overestimates convective precipitation because it does not represent the radiative effect of unresolved cumulus clouds (Herwehe et al 2014;Alapaty et al 2012). Other convection schemes, such as BMJ and GD, could be affected by similar problems, and these would be an important contribution to precipitation overestimation in summer.…”
Section: Temperature and Precipitation Bias Signaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing changes in solar power generation is arguably more difficult due to, among other things, unresolved processes in relatively coarse climate models and uncertain parameterizations (e.g., Chiacchio et al, 2015;Herwehe et al, 2014). Acknowledging this difficulty and associated uncertainties, an evaluation of the EURO-CORDEX data finds limited impacts of climate change on solar photovoltaic (PV) potentials .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, according to Clark et al (2012), many such studies are not able to 88 accurately clarify unique precipitation particle and other physical parameters in different 89 microphysical processes using regional models such as the Weather Research and Forecasting 90 (WRF) model (Skamarock and Klemp 2008). Alapaty et al (2012) and Herwehe et al (2014) 119 emphasized and documented the importance of incorporating such subgrid-scale cloud-radiation 120 interactions using the Kain-Fritsch (KF) convective parameterization scheme (Kain 2004) and 121 the Rapid Radiation Transfer Model, Global (RRTMG) schemes (Iacono et al 2008). In many NWP models, the fractional cloudiness 116 can influence atmospheric radiation budgets as well as the dynamics and thermodynamics, but in 117 the past, subgrid-scale cumulus cloudiness and the associated radiative impacts have been largely 118 neglected outside of global climate models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%