2007 Second International Conference on Systems and Networks Communications (ICSNC 2007) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icsnc.2007.44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Security of Mobile Devices by Decreasing User Effort in Verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Vildjiounaite et al [17], experiments with voice, gait and fingerprint data have shown that in most cases FAR is around 0.01 and FRR is around 0.03. However, these results are the composite of three verification systems.…”
Section: Discussion Concerning the State-of-the-art Verification Stramentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Vildjiounaite et al [17], experiments with voice, gait and fingerprint data have shown that in most cases FAR is around 0.01 and FRR is around 0.03. However, these results are the composite of three verification systems.…”
Section: Discussion Concerning the State-of-the-art Verification Stramentioning
confidence: 96%
“…While the first measurement concerns the robustness of the system to intruders, the second measurement regards usability and inconspicuousness of the system. In [17], a walking-based authentication system has been integrated with fingerprints data and voice recognition, ensuring in this way an high degree of reliability. Walking-based authentication provides 0.14 of equal error rate between FRR and FAR with little variations if the system is brought on the chest or on the waist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the actions taken in this step will be the reduction of noise in the collected data, for example by using a Moving Average or Weighted Moving Average f lter [5], but different types of f lters can also be applied [7]. In case of the MR100 sensor we also performed time equalization between the data points in a gait sample in this step, because the time between two data points was not constant.…”
Section: Average Cycle Methods (Acm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ACM method the collected gait data is represented by an "average cycle" which is then used for comparisons in the analysis. Some of the reports are on performance of gait authentication [7], while others focus on security issues like how easy it is to copy the gait characteristics of another person [8]. Also issues related to different walking circumstances have been investigated before [5].…”
Section: Gait Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At score level, the fusion system normalizes the scores coming from each biometric modality matcher and combine them into a global score [145,93,73,86]. In the decision level approach the decisions about the user identity obtained from each trait separately are combined to obtain a final decision [184].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%