2016
DOI: 10.1080/0305215x.2016.1256394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing production rate in U-type assembly lines with sequence-dependent set-up times

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Flexibility (Avikal et al, 2013;S ahin and Kellegöz, 2017) and re-configurability (Wang et al, 2009;Li et al, 2019) should be considered when designing a manufacturing system which should have the capability of adapting dynamic changes of product varieties and production volumes in a cost effective manner (Kara et al, 2011). Adapting these issues in manual assembly, WWALs are frequently used in industrial practices (Al-Zuheri et al, 2012;Wang and Bennett, 2014;Durmusoglu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flexibility (Avikal et al, 2013;S ahin and Kellegöz, 2017) and re-configurability (Wang et al, 2009;Li et al, 2019) should be considered when designing a manufacturing system which should have the capability of adapting dynamic changes of product varieties and production volumes in a cost effective manner (Kara et al, 2011). Adapting these issues in manual assembly, WWALs are frequently used in industrial practices (Al-Zuheri et al, 2012;Wang and Bennett, 2014;Durmusoglu et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different variations of task and set-up times can also be seen in the UALBP literature. S ahin and Kellegöz (2017) attempted to maximize production rate of UAL with sequence dependent setup times. In this study, two setup types, namely, forward and backward set-up are regarded.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, if the number of crossover workstations rises, it means that more opportunities for load balancing are created [10]. The U-shaped line has some benefits in comparison with straight-line, such as more flexibility in dealing with demand changes and less space requirements [11], [12], between others [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esmaeilbeigi et al [32] present three new formulations for the set-up assembly line balancing and scheduling problem. Ş ahin and Kellegöz [33] was first defined the U-line balancing with sequence-dependent setup times. They proposed a mathematical formulation, a simulated annealing approach and a genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%