2020
DOI: 10.1002/sd.2117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing positive climate impact by combining anti‐consumption and consumption changes with impact investing

Abstract: Household consumption leads to global warming potential impacts, for example, via energy consumption, production processes, and transportation. About 72% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are related to household consumption. Some of this consumption is nonessential and could therefore be reduced, leading to decreased GHG emissions. There is, however, a risk of a rebound effect if money saved by reducing consumption is used or invested in a way that leads to GHG emissions elsewhere. Therefore, in effort… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Salo and Nissinen (2017) calculated that an average Finn could decrease the personal carbon footprint by 4,300 kgCO 2 e through consumption choices. Claudelin et al (2020) examined the potential climate impact of anti-consumption and found that in Finland, people could reduce their annual personal carbon footprint by 2,085 kg CO 2 e through anti-consumption choices. Considering the above, we can assume that Mukkula residents can reduce their personal carbon footprint by 2,000-4,000 kgCO 2 e. Our estimations of societal decarbonisation actions can decrease the carbon footprint to 6,800 kgCO 2 e in 2030.…”
Section: Total Carbon Footprint In the Years 2010 2021 And 2030mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salo and Nissinen (2017) calculated that an average Finn could decrease the personal carbon footprint by 4,300 kgCO 2 e through consumption choices. Claudelin et al (2020) examined the potential climate impact of anti-consumption and found that in Finland, people could reduce their annual personal carbon footprint by 2,085 kg CO 2 e through anti-consumption choices. Considering the above, we can assume that Mukkula residents can reduce their personal carbon footprint by 2,000-4,000 kgCO 2 e. Our estimations of societal decarbonisation actions can decrease the carbon footprint to 6,800 kgCO 2 e in 2030.…”
Section: Total Carbon Footprint In the Years 2010 2021 And 2030mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It represents a form of releasing some of the pressure exerted on the different natural resources as well as the environment. The reducing approach omits consumption that is not based on real needs and eventually uplifts the efficiency of the individual's consumption patterns [48,54]. The third and last act of the anti-consumption approach is reusing.…”
Section: Sustainable Consumerismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not spending is also an uncertain way to affect the global emissions if it means higher savings rate through the banking system. The so-called second tier rebound after banks lend the saved money for others might be anything below or above 100% (Claudelin et al 2020), and tracing them is highly complex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%