2017
DOI: 10.1002/bin.1480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing on‐task behavior of an adolescent with autism using momentary differential reinforcement

Abstract: Compliance is often defined as the completion of a discrete task specified by a preceding instruction. However, compliance could also require the completion of a cluster of tasks, such as cleaning a room, getting ready for bed, or doing homework. We conducted this study to determine if a momentary differential reinforcement schedule would increase the on-task behavior of an adolescent with autism. The momentary differential reinforcement involved repeated momentary supervision checks, with tokens delivered for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, because we used fixed-ratio schedules in this study, the instructors had to continuously observe the participants’ behavior during sessions in order to deliver points following the specified number of responses. This can be effortful, but research has shown that momentary differential reinforcement schedules, in which instructors “check in” during fixed or variable intervals and deliver reinforcers contingent on momentary engagement or response products, can also be effective in maintaining task engagement (e.g., Jessel et al, 2017 ). Future research could evaluate the use of such schedules in the context of an app-based token economy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, because we used fixed-ratio schedules in this study, the instructors had to continuously observe the participants’ behavior during sessions in order to deliver points following the specified number of responses. This can be effortful, but research has shown that momentary differential reinforcement schedules, in which instructors “check in” during fixed or variable intervals and deliver reinforcers contingent on momentary engagement or response products, can also be effective in maintaining task engagement (e.g., Jessel et al, 2017 ). Future research could evaluate the use of such schedules in the context of an app-based token economy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reinforcers can be shown in a variety of ways with creative presentations; elements of surprise and suspense can make children with ASD more excited to play the reinforcer; enthusiastic tone and positive facial expression, go along with sound effects and comments can also make the reinforcer seem more appealing; physical contacts like tickles can make some children with ASD will link a new reinforcer with fun time. A humanoid robot is assumed to be an effective reinforcer because: 1) the robot which is originally designed to accompany children is age appropriate; 2) it is practical and easy to deliver; 3) the humanoid robot involved in this program is portable and user-friendly which can be used repeatedly and regularly; 4) the humanoid robot is not solitary and can be easily during other activities (Beaver et al, 2017;Anderson et al, 2017;Johnson et al, 2017;Jessel et al, 2017;Fritz et al, 2017;MacNaul et al, 2018;Goldman et al, 2019;Matsuda et al, 2019;Vandbakk et al, 2019). This research attempts to test the effectiveness of the humanoid Wukong as being the reinforcer applied in an intensive ABA intervention program.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Ai-an Ideal Reinforcementmentioning
confidence: 99%