“…Grafting in tomato was primarily practiced as an alternative to the methyl bromide for the control of soilborne pathogens under protected cultivation systems (Kaskavalci et al, 2009;Lopez-Perez et al, 2006;Louws et al, 2010;McAvoy et al, 2012;Rivard et al, 2010). However, in recent years, the potential of grafting has also been extensively exploited to deal with the abiotic stresses such as salinity (Colla et al, 2010(Colla et al, , 2013Cuartero et al, 2006;Estan et al, 2005;Santa-Cruz et al, 2001, low (Venema et al, 2008) and high (Abdelmageed and Gruda, 2009;Rivero et al, 2003a) temperature stress, water stress (Altunlu and Gul, 2012;Bhatt et al, 2015;S anchez-Rodríguez et al, 2013), and heavy metals (Kumar et al, 2015a(Kumar et al, , 2015b(Kumar et al, , 2015c, and also to enhance water-use efficiency (Cohen and Naor, 2002;Kumar et al, 2017), nutrient uptake (Goto et al, 2013), fruit yield (Kacjan-Marsic and Osvald, 2004;Khah et al, 2006;Pogonyi et al, 2005;Turhan et al, 2011), and quality (Flores et al, 2010;Kacjan-Marsic and Osvald, 2004). Therefore, the aim of using grafting techniques in tomato is to enhance fruit production without any nutritional decline and to reduce susceptibility to various abiotic and biotic stresses.…”