2012
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2012.960.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing Drought Tolerance of Tomato Plants by Grafting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These constitutive rootstock effects were observed by Al-Harbi et al (2017) and Ibrahim et al (2014), who both found that the interspecific hybrid tomato rootstock 'Unifort' had a positive effect on vegetative growth (shoot fresh weight, leaf area, leaf dry weight) and yield regardless of irrigation treatments. The significant increase in relative water content we observed when grafting onto 'Beaufort' is in agreement with the findings of Altunlu and Gul (2012). These authors found that under PEG-induced drought stress, 'Beaufort' improved relative water content in the scion, which they partially attribute to the observed increase in the osmoprotectant proline.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These constitutive rootstock effects were observed by Al-Harbi et al (2017) and Ibrahim et al (2014), who both found that the interspecific hybrid tomato rootstock 'Unifort' had a positive effect on vegetative growth (shoot fresh weight, leaf area, leaf dry weight) and yield regardless of irrigation treatments. The significant increase in relative water content we observed when grafting onto 'Beaufort' is in agreement with the findings of Altunlu and Gul (2012). These authors found that under PEG-induced drought stress, 'Beaufort' improved relative water content in the scion, which they partially attribute to the observed increase in the osmoprotectant proline.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Using reciprocal grafting between the drought-tolerant “Zarina” and sensitive “Josefina” tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes, Sánchez-Rodríguez et al (2012a , b , 2013 ) reported that increased tolerance in grafted plants to moderate water deficit was a drought-adaptive response mainly related to tolerant rootstock, which provided better plant growth and yield. Moreover, Altunlu and Gul (2012) demonstrated that when the interspecific hybrid “Beaufort” ( S. lycopersicum L. × S. habrochaites S. Knapp and D. M. Spooner) was used as rootstock, it mitigated the growth depression of tomato plants induced by water stress, compared with tomato grafted onto weak root structure rootstock (“Resistar”) or self-grafted plants. Such findings indicate a drought-adaptive response of tomato grafted onto “Beaufort” rootstock.…”
Section: Agronomic Responses Of Grafted Plants To Drought Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drought resistance of grafted tomato plants onto rootstock “Beaufort” was due to improved osmoregulation, partially induced by higher proline content, and relative water content in tomato scion under water stress ( Altunlu and Gul, 2012 ). Though net CO 2 assimilation rate decreased in polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced water stress, rootstock-grafted pepper seedlings maintained the protective capacity of the photosynthetic machinery mediated by osmotic adjustment (based on higher proline content; Penella et al, 2014b ).…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Drought Resistance In Grafted Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Grafting in tomato was primarily practiced as an alternative to the methyl bromide for the control of soilborne pathogens under protected cultivation systems (Kaskavalci et al, 2009;Lopez-Perez et al, 2006;Louws et al, 2010;McAvoy et al, 2012;Rivard et al, 2010). However, in recent years, the potential of grafting has also been extensively exploited to deal with the abiotic stresses such as salinity (Colla et al, 2010(Colla et al, , 2013Cuartero et al, 2006;Estan et al, 2005;Santa-Cruz et al, 2001, low (Venema et al, 2008) and high (Abdelmageed and Gruda, 2009;Rivero et al, 2003a) temperature stress, water stress (Altunlu and Gul, 2012;Bhatt et al, 2015;S anchez-Rodríguez et al, 2013), and heavy metals (Kumar et al, 2015a(Kumar et al, , 2015b(Kumar et al, , 2015c, and also to enhance water-use efficiency (Cohen and Naor, 2002;Kumar et al, 2017), nutrient uptake (Goto et al, 2013), fruit yield (Kacjan-Marsic and Osvald, 2004;Khah et al, 2006;Pogonyi et al, 2005;Turhan et al, 2011), and quality (Flores et al, 2010;Kacjan-Marsic and Osvald, 2004). Therefore, the aim of using grafting techniques in tomato is to enhance fruit production without any nutritional decline and to reduce susceptibility to various abiotic and biotic stresses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%