2017
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing canopy photosynthesis in rice can be achieved without a large increase in water use—A model based on free‐air CO2 enrichment

Abstract: Achieving higher canopy photosynthesis rates is one of the keys to increasing future crop production; however, this typically requires additional water inputs because of increased water loss through the stomata. Lowland rice canopies presently consume a large amount of water, and any further increase in water usage may significantly impact local water resources. This situation is further complicated by changing the environmental conditions such as rising atmospheric CO concentration ([CO ]). Here, we modeled a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
1
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially the high photosynthetic capacity of Takanari results in a damped response to atmospheric warming when CO 2 levels rise, as the high stomatal conductance and transpiration associated with this higher photosynthesis of Takanari resulted in a larger evaporative cooling effect compared to Koshihikari. The difference in canopy temperature between the two varieties (~0.8 ° C) is greater than that reported in our recent model study (~0.5 ° C; Figure 7‐c in Ikawa et al, ), which assumed the same canopy architecture between the two varieties. This emphasizes the importance of considering differences in architectural effects between varieties in future modeling studies.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Especially the high photosynthetic capacity of Takanari results in a damped response to atmospheric warming when CO 2 levels rise, as the high stomatal conductance and transpiration associated with this higher photosynthesis of Takanari resulted in a larger evaporative cooling effect compared to Koshihikari. The difference in canopy temperature between the two varieties (~0.8 ° C) is greater than that reported in our recent model study (~0.5 ° C; Figure 7‐c in Ikawa et al, ), which assumed the same canopy architecture between the two varieties. This emphasizes the importance of considering differences in architectural effects between varieties in future modeling studies.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Resulting from a reduced radiative in‐canopy interception, daytime in‐canopy temperatures of Koshihikari were lower compared to Takanari (Figure a). However, lower (~0.5 ° C) leaf temperatures were found in Takanari, which likely resulted from the higher stomatal conductance of Takanari and its associated higher evaporative cooling rates known for this variety (Ikawa et al, ). Paradoxically, this did not result in a more humid canopy (Figure b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations