2020
DOI: 10.1029/2019jg005452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Quantifying the Feedback Between Rice Architecture, Physiology, and Microclimate Under Current and Future CO2 Conditions

Abstract: To assess the micrometeorological consequences of rice variety choices in relation to rising CO2 associated to climate change, we quantified the interplay between rice architecture, physiology, and microclimate in current (~385 μmol mol−1) and future (~580 μmol mol−1) CO2 microenvironments. Two rice varieties contrasting in canopy structure and physiology were grown embedded in irrigated rice paddies, under elevated CO2 (using a Free‐Air CO2 Enrichment facility) and ambient CO2 conditions. The high‐yielding in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nitrogen reduction and the stimulated biomass by elevated CO 2 could induce relative nitrogen limitation and shading; thus, in Koshihikari, the response of PD to kinetin at elevated CO 2 may had been affected by the stimulation effect of elevated CO 2 on plant growth and the reduction effect on plant nitrogen. Takanari, however, can maintain plant nitrogen content at elevated CO 2 and is photosynthetically more active and characterized by a more open canopy than Koshihikari (Chen, Sakai, et al., 2014; Muryono et al., 2017; Sikma et al., 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen reduction and the stimulated biomass by elevated CO 2 could induce relative nitrogen limitation and shading; thus, in Koshihikari, the response of PD to kinetin at elevated CO 2 may had been affected by the stimulation effect of elevated CO 2 on plant growth and the reduction effect on plant nitrogen. Takanari, however, can maintain plant nitrogen content at elevated CO 2 and is photosynthetically more active and characterized by a more open canopy than Koshihikari (Chen, Sakai, et al., 2014; Muryono et al., 2017; Sikma et al., 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the increase in T c shown in Fig. 14 is reasonable compared with the results of the past rice FACE experiments (Yoshimoto et al 2005;Sikma et al 2020), we retain the current model for this study.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Leaves are the most sensitive organ for the short‐term regulation of canopy temperature; and characteristics such as leaf size, shape, and angle toward the sun affect heat conduction between the rice plant and its environment, which affects canopy temperature (Parkhurst & Loucks, 1972; Smith, 1978). The area around the leaf boundary facilitates convective heat exchange and increasing this area can help reduce the canopy temperature to improve endurance during dry and hot conditions (Sikma et al, 2020). Mathematical analysis has revealed that cumulative temperature rather than non‐cumulative photosynthetically active radiation can trigger exponential canopy growth (Fukuda et al, 2021).…”
Section: Factors Influencing Rice Canopy Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%