2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased microparticle tissue factor activity in cancer patients with Venous Thromboembolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
149
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
149
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Strikingly, no MP-associated TF activity was found in non-cancer patients who had suffered from acute VTE. Also Manly et al detected higher MP-associated TF activity levels in 53 cancer patients with different tumour types and acute VTE than in 13 cancer patients without VTE [42]. Furthermore, Zwicker et al applied a newly developed method, the impedance flow cytometry, and showed elevated numbers of TF-positive MPs in 60% of cancer patients with acute VTE compared to 27% of cancer patients without VTE [10].In contrast to the above-mentioned studies, in our large prospective study we measured baseline MP levels of cancer patients and followed them over a 2-year period or until occurrence of VTE or death or loss of follow-up, in order to find parameters that might be predictive of cancer-associated VTE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strikingly, no MP-associated TF activity was found in non-cancer patients who had suffered from acute VTE. Also Manly et al detected higher MP-associated TF activity levels in 53 cancer patients with different tumour types and acute VTE than in 13 cancer patients without VTE [42]. Furthermore, Zwicker et al applied a newly developed method, the impedance flow cytometry, and showed elevated numbers of TF-positive MPs in 60% of cancer patients with acute VTE compared to 27% of cancer patients without VTE [10].In contrast to the above-mentioned studies, in our large prospective study we measured baseline MP levels of cancer patients and followed them over a 2-year period or until occurrence of VTE or death or loss of follow-up, in order to find parameters that might be predictive of cancer-associated VTE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Nevertheless, this prothrombinase assay is a well established method that had previously been used in several different clinical studies for the assessment of circulating procoagulant MPs in patients with a variety of diseases, such as sepsis [39], HIV [26], type 1 and type 2 diabetes [40], acute coronary syndrome [41], VTE [14,42], and preeclampsia [43]. Yet, up to date there are no studies applying this functional prothrombinase assay in a solid phase in cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16][17][18][19] In some patients with pancreatic cancer, high levels of TF-positive MPs are found in the circulation and, in a small pilot study, were predictive of VTE. [5][6][7]9,20 In a mouse model of human colorectal tumors, human TF protein is released into the circulation. 21 In nude mice bearing orthotopic human pancreatic tumors (L3.6pl) plasma levels of human TF protein were correlated with the levels of thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) complex, a marker of the activation of coagulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Another potential circulating biomarker of VTE risk in pancreatic cancer patients is microparticle (MP) tissue factor (TF). [5][6][7][8][9] Full-length TF (flTF) is a transmembrane protein that activates the coagulation cascade. 10 In addition, an alternatively spliced form of TF (asTF) has been identified that lacks a membrane anchor and therefore can be released as a soluble protein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients' serum TF level was about 67% higher than normal (Kakkar and DeRuvo, 1995). The increase in the TF level in circulated blood is responsible for the formation of malignant tumor patients' hypercoagulable state and is an important reason for phlebothrombosis (Manly et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%