2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased jump height and reduced EMG activity with an external focus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
132
1
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
132
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The athletes benefited from external attention focus (regardless of attention focus distance) and the lack of attention focus instructions did not weaken performance of athletes; this is consistent with findings of many studies [12,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. The restricted action hypothesis (Wulf et al) attributes the supremacy of external focus of attention to diverting attention from motion and shifting it toward motion effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The athletes benefited from external attention focus (regardless of attention focus distance) and the lack of attention focus instructions did not weaken performance of athletes; this is consistent with findings of many studies [12,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. The restricted action hypothesis (Wulf et al) attributes the supremacy of external focus of attention to diverting attention from motion and shifting it toward motion effects.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Some tasks were jump height [12], dart throwing [13], goal directed ball throwing [14], hitting the golf ball [15], tennis [16] and throwing accuracy [17]. Depending on type of motor tasks and skill level of performers, the effects of factors will be different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a second main outcome, electromyography (EMG) activity was analysed for each condition. Previous studies have shown that -despite enhanced motor performance when using an EFmuscular activity was lower with EF than with IF (Marchant, Greig, & Scott, 2009;Vance, Wulf, Tollner, McNevin, & Mercer, 2004;Wulf et al, 2010). It was therefore hypothesised that a higher level of muscular activity would be found in the IF condition compared to the EF condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Generally, an EF means that participants direct their attention on the effects of their movement on the environment, whereas an IF means that participants should focus their attention on body parts that are primarily involved in the movement. With respect to jumping movements, enhanced jump performance for maximum countermovement jumps (CMJs) (Wulf & Dufek, 2009;Wulf, Dufek, Lozano, & Pettigrew, 2010) as well as standing long jumps (Porter, Anton, Wikoff, & Ostrowski, 2013;Porter, Anton, & Wu, 2012;Porter, Ostrowski, Nolan, & Wu, 2010;Wu, Porter, & Brown, 2012) was reported when participants used an EF. Interestingly, it was also shown that despite the enhanced jump performance, muscular activity is generally reduced in CMJs when using an EF compared to an IF (Wulf et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constrained action hypothesis claims that the reason for superiority of external focus of attention is facilitation of automatic control of motion. This superiority has been proven in various motor activities such as basketball (27), balance tasks (19), tennis (13), jumping (23), dart throwing (4), and aiming (18). However, some studies showed opposite and paradoxical results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%