1965
DOI: 10.1159/000229622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased in vitro Tuberculin and Endotoxin Leukocytolysis Following Skin Tests with Homologous and Heterologous Substances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1974
1974

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific unresponsiveness produced in adult animals by single or repeated systemic doses of protein antigen has been shown by suitable transfer experiments to depend on a specific inability of lymphoid cells to respond to antigenic challenge (22). The apparent non-specificity of the inhibitory effect under consideration here, i. e. the effectiveness of Nocardia and of lipopolysaccharide antigens from Gram-negative organisms as well as of tubercle bacilli, may be illusory since these materials contain cross-reacting antigens (23,24). On the other hand, sensitization with a competing antigen such as ovalbumin or bovine serum albumin has been shown to inhibit ad juvant disease largely or completely (25,26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific unresponsiveness produced in adult animals by single or repeated systemic doses of protein antigen has been shown by suitable transfer experiments to depend on a specific inability of lymphoid cells to respond to antigenic challenge (22). The apparent non-specificity of the inhibitory effect under consideration here, i. e. the effectiveness of Nocardia and of lipopolysaccharide antigens from Gram-negative organisms as well as of tubercle bacilli, may be illusory since these materials contain cross-reacting antigens (23,24). On the other hand, sensitization with a competing antigen such as ovalbumin or bovine serum albumin has been shown to inhibit ad juvant disease largely or completely (25,26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%