2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2019.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased expression of DCLK1, a novel putative CSC maker, is associated with tumor aggressiveness and worse disease-specific survival in patients with bladder carcinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
7
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previous works, oncopathological value of DCLK1 expression was evaluated in various cancers including colorectal, bladder, and gastric carcinomas; results of which were in line with other studies 17,19,23,[27][28][29][30] . In a comprehensive study on 472 bladder cancer cases, an increase was found in expression of DCLK1 (DCLK1-L/S) that associated with more aggressive tumors, advanced stages, and poorer DSS in the patients with bladder cancer 19 . Additionally, results of our previous study on local and circulating DCLK1 (DCLK1-L) in 58 fresh CRC tissues and their correspondent normal margins demonstrated signi cantly higher expression of DCLK1 in the patients with CRC having advanced-stage and higher tumor grade in both protein and mRNA expression levels 28 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our previous works, oncopathological value of DCLK1 expression was evaluated in various cancers including colorectal, bladder, and gastric carcinomas; results of which were in line with other studies 17,19,23,[27][28][29][30] . In a comprehensive study on 472 bladder cancer cases, an increase was found in expression of DCLK1 (DCLK1-L/S) that associated with more aggressive tumors, advanced stages, and poorer DSS in the patients with bladder cancer 19 . Additionally, results of our previous study on local and circulating DCLK1 (DCLK1-L) in 58 fresh CRC tissues and their correspondent normal margins demonstrated signi cantly higher expression of DCLK1 in the patients with CRC having advanced-stage and higher tumor grade in both protein and mRNA expression levels 28 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In parallel, the results of immune electron microscopy (IEM) have con rmed the presence of S-isoform in cytosol, mitochondrial, and cell membrane fractions of HCT-116 and COLO205-S-GFP cell lines, unlike L-isoform that was present mainly in cell membrane fractions of HEK293 cells only expressing L-isoform 10 . Other clinical studies used anti-DCLK1-L/S or anti DCLK1-L antibodies have also reported mainly cytoplasmic and membranous localization of DCLK1 in gastric, colorectal, and bladder carcinoma tissues 18,19,30,31 , meanwhile in the current study, nucleus localization of DCLK1-S was shown in tumor cells area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In parallel, the results of immune electron microscopy (IEM) have con rmed the presence of S-isoform in cytosol, mitochondrial, and cell membrane fractions of HCT-116 and COLO205-S-GFP cell lines, unlike L-isoform that was present mainly in cell membrane fractions of HEK293 cells only expressing L-isoform [10]. Other clinical studies used anti-DCLK1-L/S or anti DCLK1-L antibodies have also reported mainly cytoplasmic and membranous localization of DCLK1 in gastric, colorectal, and bladder carcinoma tissues [18,19,33,43], meanwhile in the current study, nucleus localization of DCLK1-S was shown in tumor cells area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In our previous research, expression pattern and prognostic signi cance of DCLK1 have been studied in colorectal, gastric, and bladder carcinomas [17][18][19][20][21] using available commercial anti-DCLK1 antibodies that can detect C-terminal domain of both DCLK1-L/S isoforms or only N-terminal end of DCLK1-L isoform, while role of the main isoform to overexpress DCLK1 has remained unknown. To the best of our knowledge, there is no commercial anti-DCLK1-S antibody, and also no study has been previously performed to investigate prognostic signi cance of DCLK1-S on tumor tissues, particularly in CRC by immunohistochemistry (IHC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that there was increased DCLK1 expression among a sample of Iranian BC cases in comparison with normal margins. Moreover, the DCLK1 overexpression was correlated with higher stage, grade, poor prognosis, low survival rate, and tumor aggressiveness (Shafiei et al, 2019). BMI1 (OMIM: 164831) is belonged to the polycomb group (PcG) proteins which are transcriptional suppressors (Orlando, 2003).…”
Section: Self‐renewalmentioning
confidence: 99%