“…Despite the specificity is very high, the sensitivity of Kato-Katz in single stool sample examination is becoming not satisfied, especially when the number of worms is low or the test is done after the eggs were eliminated from the body [1,6] , which leads to measurement error in estimating the presence of infection [1] . Nevertheless, there is a possibility to increase the sensitivity of Kato-Katz smear through examination of multiple samples [5] , but this is a limiting procedure for field study [7] . Moreover, this microscopic method is unsufficient in the areas of low endemicity, in post-treatment situations, and in the control of transmission [8,9] .…”