Despite the widespread use of metallic implants in orthopedic surgery and dentistry, gaps remain in our understanding of the biology of bone-implant integration, or osseointegration. Fundamental questions exist about osseointegration, including whether bone-implant integration differs from natural bone healing, why bone formation initiates at the implant interface and concentrically distant from the implant surface, and why bone remodeling and resorption vary in different regions around the implant[1-3]. Although the design of implant screw threads has been refined from a mechanical perspec-tive for better initial implant stability, the biological impact of thread design has not been explored. Various implant surfaces have been developed to accelerate and enhance bone-implant integration, but the biological mechanisms underpinning these improvements have yet to be fully investigated .Ultraviolet (UV) light has recently been used to favorably modify implant surfaces [2,3,. For example, titanium surfaces, regardless of their surface texture, are hydrophobic (H 2 O contact angle ≥60°), and treating these surfaces with UV light converts them to a superhydrophilic state with a contact angle of ≤5° or 0° for the majority of currently used titanium surfaces [30,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63]. This UV-induced hydrophilic conversion also occurs with other implant materials including titanium alloy, chromium-cobalt alloy, and zirconia [29,38,39,41,42,44,45,47,[64][65][66][67][68]. These superhydrophilic implant surfaces promote cell attachment and increase the speed and percentage of bone coverage around the implants [2,3,9,30,32,34,[69][70][71][72]. Osteogenesis around superhydrophilic implants is concentrated at J Prosthodont Res. 2022; **(**):