2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12302-019-0235-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increase coherence, cooperation and cross-compliance of regulations on chemicals and water quality

Abstract: An analysis of existing regulatory frameworks for chemicals reveals a fragmented situation with a number of regulatory frameworks designed for specific groups of chemicals; for protection of different end-points and covering different parts of the chemicals´ life cycle stages. Lack of-and fragmented information on chemicals (properties, use, emissions as well as fate, occurrence and effects in the environment) limit the ability for assessment and early action, and existing legislation would benefit from more t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is far higher than the toxic pressure threshold value utilized in chemical safety assessment/chemical, which is defined as msPAF‐no‐observed‐effect concentration = 5% and is used as a science‐based threshold to define the PNEC. Studies by Malaj et al (2014) and Posthuma et al (2019b) confirm that water body‐ or area‐specific exposures of single chemicals and mixtures indeed suggest that a nontoxic environment (European Commission 2014; Munthe et al 2019) or toxic‐free environment (European Commission 2019) seems far away. Thus, the comprehensive assessment of emissions, fate, and mixture impacts serves to provide the kinds of outputs needed to provide a basis for prospective decision support and prioritization of actions to forward the goal of the zero‐pollution policy ambition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is far higher than the toxic pressure threshold value utilized in chemical safety assessment/chemical, which is defined as msPAF‐no‐observed‐effect concentration = 5% and is used as a science‐based threshold to define the PNEC. Studies by Malaj et al (2014) and Posthuma et al (2019b) confirm that water body‐ or area‐specific exposures of single chemicals and mixtures indeed suggest that a nontoxic environment (European Commission 2014; Munthe et al 2019) or toxic‐free environment (European Commission 2019) seems far away. Thus, the comprehensive assessment of emissions, fate, and mixture impacts serves to provide the kinds of outputs needed to provide a basis for prospective decision support and prioritization of actions to forward the goal of the zero‐pollution policy ambition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A better protection of water quality from mixture risks requires not only conceptual and technical innovation in monitoring and assessment but may also demand for changes to the WFD and a better coordination across the pieces of European chemical legislation [19] as well as an increase in coherence, cooperation and cross-compliance of chemicals and water regulations [20]. To finally meet the European policy goals for achieving a sustainable, nontoxic environment, European collaborative environmental research should be strengthened to mobilize the extensive European research capacities and competences required to address the enormous challenges we are facing to reduce modern society's footprints in general and toxic risks in particular [21].…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the chemical industry continuously innovates, currently developed tools for environmental risk assessment struggle to keep up with the diversity of chemicals and their uses [2]. Pollution occurs across the whole life cycle of a product from its production until its final disposal, whilst regulation typically only addresses the point at which products are placed on the market, which is only a small part of that lifecycle [3]. The increasing amount and diversity of emerging chemicals on the EU market that can enter water resources, means it is important to consider whether changes to chemical and water resources management need to be made in order to inexpensively safeguard water resources in their natural state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%