1977
DOI: 10.1016/0301-0104(77)87060-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporation of electronically nonadiabatic effects into bimolecular reactive systems. II. The collinear (H2 + H+, H2+ + H) system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since all contours are assumed to be in the plane no contour is capable to surround this axis (which is in the plane) and therefore a different way to include the RT effect has to be found. Based on our past experience [19][20][21] a trustful way to include the RT effect is to let the contours intersect the degeneracy line and in this way to enable the corresponding NACT matrix elements to pick up the resulting RT effect. The only problem encountered here is that these calculated NACTs are extremely spiky-reminiscent of the Dirac δ-function (see, e.g., Fig.…”
Section: (B))mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since all contours are assumed to be in the plane no contour is capable to surround this axis (which is in the plane) and therefore a different way to include the RT effect has to be found. Based on our past experience [19][20][21] a trustful way to include the RT effect is to let the contours intersect the degeneracy line and in this way to enable the corresponding NACT matrix elements to pick up the resulting RT effect. The only problem encountered here is that these calculated NACTs are extremely spiky-reminiscent of the Dirac δ-function (see, e.g., Fig.…”
Section: (B))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that at each such intersection point, along a short interval perpendicular to the collinear axis, is formed a spiky non-zero NACT (in this case an angular NACT) with features reminiscent of a Dirac δ-function. 21(b), 31 Thus, our first tendency is to assume that the angular RT-NACTs in the planar CS take the form 3…”
Section: Presentation Of the Intra-planar Rt Nactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional solution consists of finding an electronic basis set that converts the NACMEs into nonsingular operators or eventually fully removes them. Such a basis set is called diabatic [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] by comparison with the former adiabatic one. Two types of diabatic bases are apparently possible: the diabatic I basis that removes only the singular part of the NACMEs, and the strictly diabatic [10,11,13,15,17] (diabatic II) basis that fully removes the NACMEs decoupling the nuclear equations of motion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the wide use of diabatic basis sets, the existence of an orthogonal transformation leading to a strictly diabatic basis has been a problematic issue since the seminal works by McLachlan [3,20], Mead and Truhlar [10] (see also Refs. [11,13,15,17]), and Baer [7][8][9] (for a recent debate, see Refs. [21,22]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baer extended this procedure to the atom-diatom collision [24] and applied it successfully in various cases [5,6]_ According to this procedure, the transformation matrix (called below G) is obtained as a solution of a firstorder vector differential equation: V*G+T(')G=O, where V is the vectorial covariant gradient operator in terms ofN nuclear coordinates and T(l) is a vector matrix the elements of which are antisymmetric.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%