2002
DOI: 10.1002/qua.10297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Existence of strictly diabatic basis sets for the two‐state problem

Abstract: Some new properties of the nonadiabatic coupling elements are derived, in particular the orthogonality and gauge invariance of their longitudinal and transverse components. A method for constructing a strictly diabatic basis set that makes both the transverse and longitudinal components of the nonadiabatic coupling elements of the two-state problem vanish identically and is based on introducing overlap between the electronic states in the vicinity of the crossing seam is proposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(16), the general adiabatic electronic wave vectors {|ψ I ( r ; R )〉} can be represented by a one‐parameter orthogonal transformation of the initial electronic wave vectors | E x ( r )〉 and | E y ( r )〉; R represents the full set of nuclear coordinates. For the two‐state problem, one has or, in matrix form, where γ( R ) is the mixing angle 16, 17, 29 (this has been shown 17 to be equivalent, up to a constant, to the so‐called adiabatic to diabatic transformation angle 30–33). We observe that ψ i ( i = 1, 2) are real and that they change sign over a closed loop around the degeneracy point.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16), the general adiabatic electronic wave vectors {|ψ I ( r ; R )〉} can be represented by a one‐parameter orthogonal transformation of the initial electronic wave vectors | E x ( r )〉 and | E y ( r )〉; R represents the full set of nuclear coordinates. For the two‐state problem, one has or, in matrix form, where γ( R ) is the mixing angle 16, 17, 29 (this has been shown 17 to be equivalent, up to a constant, to the so‐called adiabatic to diabatic transformation angle 30–33). We observe that ψ i ( i = 1, 2) are real and that they change sign over a closed loop around the degeneracy point.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%