2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.111499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating LiDAR metrics into a structure-based habitat model for a canopy-dwelling species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MaxEnt version 3.3.4 k (Phillips et al 2006) was used to create predictive habitat models for the occurrence and nest locations from 2012 to 2017 for Akikiki and Akekee at 10-, 100-, and 250 m spatial resolutions (Approach 2). Feature types were limited to linear, product, or quadratic features to reduce model complexity as recommended for presence-only modeling (Hagar et al 2020), and default options for background sampling were used. The nine metrics derived from 1 m lidar were used as environmental layer inputs for each model (canopy height, canopy density, elevation, slope, topographic wetness index, and four relative height metrics).…”
Section: Predictive Habitat Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MaxEnt version 3.3.4 k (Phillips et al 2006) was used to create predictive habitat models for the occurrence and nest locations from 2012 to 2017 for Akikiki and Akekee at 10-, 100-, and 250 m spatial resolutions (Approach 2). Feature types were limited to linear, product, or quadratic features to reduce model complexity as recommended for presence-only modeling (Hagar et al 2020), and default options for background sampling were used. The nine metrics derived from 1 m lidar were used as environmental layer inputs for each model (canopy height, canopy density, elevation, slope, topographic wetness index, and four relative height metrics).…”
Section: Predictive Habitat Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In forest monitoring, detailed canopy information is more useful than other remote sensing approaches (Maltamo et al 2006). The ALS-derived metrics describe the key characteristics of a forest and are valuable for the prediction and monitoring of various attributes, such as tree species (Van Aardt et al 2008), height (Maltamo et al 2004), diameter distribution (Räty et al 2018), volume (Naesset, 1997), spatial patterns of the trees (Packalen et al 2013), structural complexity of the forests (Valbuena et al 2013), biomass and carbon stocks (Naesset and Gobakken 2008;Valbuena et al 2017a), and wildlife habitats (Hagar et al 2020). Moreover, ALS data is also reliable for the evaluation of canopy changes and to compare different forest areas (McInerney et al 2010).…”
Section: Assessment Of Forest Structural Attributes From Alsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest structural types assessment is important for wildlife habitat management (Hagar et al 2020), biodiversity (Lelli et al 2019), biomass and carbon storage (Clark and Clark 2000;Marvin et al 2014), natural dynamics in forests, such as thinning and disturbances (Coomes and Allen 2007a) or if these dynamics are artificially modified (Valbuena et al 2016a). In this study, various FST were identified in a simple two-tier approach by utilising four forest attributes -, , andobtained from the Boreal, Mediterranean and Atlantic biogeographical regions, which made it feasible for a regional assessment of the FST.…”
Section: Simplifying the Cross-bioregional Assessment Of Fst (Ii)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Kueppers et al (2005) used discriminant analysis to study the potential ranges of two California endemic oaks in response to regional climate change. Hagar et al (2020) used maximum entropy (MAXENT) to predict the habitat suitability of northern spotted owl in Oregon with forest structural attributes derived from airborne light detection and ranging data. When both observed presence and absence data are available, it is straightforward to apply standard binary classifiers such as logistic regression and neural network to predict the conditional probability of species occurrence at given locations (Guisan et al, 2002;Li et al, 2011;Marmion et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%