2013
DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2013.0781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating Direct Marketing Activity into Latent Attrition Models

Abstract: When defection is unobserved, latent attrition models provide useful insights about customer behavior and accurate forecasts of customer value. Yet extant models ignore direct marketing efforts. Response models incorporate the effects of direct marketing, but because they ignore latent attrition, they may lead firms to waste resources on inactive customers. We propose a parsimonious model that allows direct marketing to impact three relevant behaviors in latent attrition models—the frequency with which custom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because identifying churn is already a challenge (as it is unobserved), the literature on noncontractual settings has mostly focused on identifying which customers are most likely to have "died" (i.e., silently churned), rather than identifying which factors precede such latent attrition. Notable exceptions are Braun et al (2015), Knox and Van Oest (2014), Schweidel and Knox (2013), and Schweidel et al (2014), which build on the aforementioned latent attrition models and allow for covariates such as direct marketing activity and characteristics of customer transactions to impact the probability of (silently) churning.…”
Section: Overt Vs Silent Churnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because identifying churn is already a challenge (as it is unobserved), the literature on noncontractual settings has mostly focused on identifying which customers are most likely to have "died" (i.e., silently churned), rather than identifying which factors precede such latent attrition. Notable exceptions are Braun et al (2015), Knox and Van Oest (2014), Schweidel and Knox (2013), and Schweidel et al (2014), which build on the aforementioned latent attrition models and allow for covariates such as direct marketing activity and characteristics of customer transactions to impact the probability of (silently) churning.…”
Section: Overt Vs Silent Churnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much less work has been devoted to predicting attrition in non-contractual settings, where attrition is latent. More work is needed to evaluate the accuracy of latent attrition measures and its predictors (e.g., [80]).…”
Section: Designing Single Retention Campaignsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the value of kj , customers may become more or less likely to remain active on activity k. 4 If kj = 0, customer h's tendency to become inactive on activity k would be time invariant (e.g., Fader et al 2010). If other timevarying covariates were available and believed to affect the transaction incidence or attrition processes, they could be incorporated into Equations (1) and (6) (e.g., Schweidel and Knox 2013). Although Equation (6) allows for heterogeneity across customers and the effect of recent activity on the attrition processes, it omits two important factors that may affect the activity-specific attrition processes in a multiactivity setting.…”
Section: The Latent Attrition Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the model's ability to identify those customers who are likely to conduct transactions during the forecasting period, we rank customers in descending order using the expectations of purchasing and posting incidences during the forecasting period. In Figure 4, we present the proportion of customers conducting a transaction during the forecasting period based on these rankings (Schweidel and Knox 2013).…”
Section: Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation