2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating connectivity into conservation planning: A multi-criteria case study from central Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
10

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
45
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Sin embargo, será necesario realizar análisis de distribución con estos datos mediante modelos predictivos, que nos permitan obtener mayor información. El nodo Centro de México se encuentra ubicado en una zona donde ya se han realizado algunos estudios para establecer prioridades de conservación de los mamíferos (Fuller et al 2006), donde de manera indirecta, también se propone conservar su helmintofauna.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Sin embargo, será necesario realizar análisis de distribución con estos datos mediante modelos predictivos, que nos permitan obtener mayor información. El nodo Centro de México se encuentra ubicado en una zona donde ya se han realizado algunos estudios para establecer prioridades de conservación de los mamíferos (Fuller et al 2006), donde de manera indirecta, también se propone conservar su helmintofauna.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…It works as an effective tool that should be applied in systematic conservation planning to identify and interconnect priority regions, particularly those already covered by natural protected areas [69]. Moreover, it is an efficient tool for identifying gaps in actual reserve systems, especially when it highlights regions that surround protected areas and, therefore, complement proposed conservation plans [69][70][71]. Although amphibians and reptiles are not commonly used as biodiversity surrogates in systematic conservation planning [22], recently, niche-based distribution models combined with reserve selection techniques were used to pinpoint conservation priorities in India [22] and Mexico [72].…”
Section: Implications For Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nandini et al (2009) recommended forest corridors connecting disturbed habitat as an important con servation measure. Fuller et al (2006) suggested the need for effective conservation plans which take into account both the need for protected area connectivity and the requirements of the local human population (Gillingham & Lee 1999), possibly through multi-criteria analysis (Moffett & Sarkar 2006) and ecological niche modeling (Thorn et al 2009). It is necessary to raise awareness among the tribal people of Arunachal Pradesh for wildlife species, particularly for primate species such as the slow loris, which act as seed dispersal agents and which prey on several forest insect species (biological control).…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%