2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rssm.2017.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Income volatility and mobility: A conceptual exploration of two frameworks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, among all families, the variability in pre‐tax and transfer income increased by 35% between 1980 and 2012 (Figure ; Hardy, ). Socioeconomically disadvantaged families—specifically those with less‐educated household heads, Black families, and families headed by a single‐mother—reported the highest levels of earnings and income volatility and the largest increases in volatility over time (Gennetian, Rodrigues, Hill, & Morris, ; Hardy, ; Hardy & Ziliak, ; Hryshko, Juhn, & McCue, ; Keys, ; Latner, ; Morduch & Schneider, ). Even married families are not necessarily protected from volatility because partners may work within the same sectors of the economy and suffer the same economic cycles (Ziliak et al, ).…”
Section: The Rise In Earnings and Income Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, among all families, the variability in pre‐tax and transfer income increased by 35% between 1980 and 2012 (Figure ; Hardy, ). Socioeconomically disadvantaged families—specifically those with less‐educated household heads, Black families, and families headed by a single‐mother—reported the highest levels of earnings and income volatility and the largest increases in volatility over time (Gennetian, Rodrigues, Hill, & Morris, ; Hardy, ; Hardy & Ziliak, ; Hryshko, Juhn, & McCue, ; Keys, ; Latner, ; Morduch & Schneider, ). Even married families are not necessarily protected from volatility because partners may work within the same sectors of the economy and suffer the same economic cycles (Ziliak et al, ).…”
Section: The Rise In Earnings and Income Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…household heads, Black families, and families headed by a single-mother-reported the highest levels of earnings and income volatility and the largest increases in volatility over time (Gennetian, Rodrigues, Hill, & Morris, 2018a;Hardy, 2017;Hardy & Ziliak, 2014;Hryshko, Juhn, & McCue, 2017;Keys, 2008;Latner, 2018;Morduch & Schneider, 2016). Even married families are not necessarily protected from volatility because partners may work within the same sectors of the economy and suffer the same economic cycles (Ziliak et al, 2011).…”
Section: The Rise In Earnings and Income Volatilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And now, as we exit this turbulent period, both variances also show signs of starting to decline from their recession peaks. Finally, new efforts are underway to link the concepts of instability and mobility in policy relevant ways (see Latner 2018).…”
Section: Volatility Instability and Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSID intragenerational mobility literature has focused on longer term movements up and down the income scale from a starting position. For instance, several studies have chronicled the way that “middle-class incomes” changed, with more upward than downward mobility during the 1970s and 1980s through the mid-1990s, to the opposite in more recent times (Bayaz-Ozturk, Burkhauser, and Couch 2013; DeBaker et al 2010; Duncan, Rodgers, and Smeeding 1993; Duncan et al 1996; Dynan et al 2012; Latner 2018; Shin and Solon 2011).…”
Section: Volatility Instability and Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, most existing studies on family income volatility and developmental outcomes have mainly examined the effects of upward and downward volatility (e.g., Hardy, 2014 ). Although reference has been made to “fluctuating volatility” or “economic instability,” which refers to a combination of income gain and loss or vice versa, no research has so far examined the effect of this conceptualization on childhood outcomes ( Hill, 2018 ; Latner, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%