Income Segregation and Intergenerational Mobility Across Colleges in the United States*

Abstract

We construct publicly available statistics on parents’ incomes and students’ earnings outcomes for each college in the United States using deidentified data from tax records. These statistics reveal that the degree of parental income segregation across colleges is very high, similar to that across neighborhoods. Differences in postcollege earnings between children from low- and high-income families are much smaller among students who attend the same college than across colleges. Colleges with the best earnings outcomes predominantly enroll students from high-income families, although a few mid-tier public colleges have both low parent income levels and high student earnings. Linking these income data to SAT and ACT scores, we simulate how changes in the allocation of students to colleges affect segregation and intergenerational mobility. Equalizing application, admission, and matriculation rates across parental income groups conditional on test scores would reduce segregation substantially, primarily by increasing the representation of middle-class students at more selective colleges. However, it would have little effect on the fraction of low-income students at elite private colleges because there are relatively few students from low-income families with sufficiently high SAT/ACT scores. Differences in parental income distributions across colleges could be eliminated by giving low- and middle-income students a sliding-scale preference in the application and admissions process similar to that implicitly given to legacy students at elite private colleges. Assuming that 80% of observational differences in students’ earnings conditional on test scores, race, and parental income are due to colleges’ causal effects—a strong assumption, but one consistent with prior work—such changes could reduce intergenerational income persistence among college students by about 25%. We conclude that changing how students are allocated to colleges could substantially reduce segregation and increase intergenerational mobility, even without changing colleges’ educational programs.

Stunted upward mobility in a learning environment reduces the academic benefits of growth mindsets

“…Our findings press for the urgency to galvanize the upward mobility in the education system ( 7 , 8 ). The mobility in American education, particularly with respect to college admission, has not been improving and is showing signs of regression ( 4 – 7 ). While measures to arrest the downward spiral are important for social justice and stability ( 2 , 3 ), we suggest another benefit.…”

“…Children in higher, as opposed to lower, social classes are grossly overrepresented in universities ( 4 – 6 ), with the greatest imbalance found in the most prestigious institutions. A recent analysis suggests that children from the wealthiest 1% of households are 77 times more likely to attend an Ivy-Plus college than those whose parents are in the bottom income quintile ( 7 ). Given the strong relationship between education and social status and income in adult life, much research has scrutinized the profound implications of a low-mobility educational system for social justice and stability ( 1 , 3 , 8 ).…”

The Economic Impacts of COVID-19: Evidence from a New Public Database Built Using Private Sector Data

“…We do not directly observe cardholders' incomes in our data; instead, we proxy for cardholders' incomes using the median household income in the ZIP code in which they live (based on data from the 2014-18 American Community Survey). ZIP-codes are strong predictors of income because of the degree of segregation in most American cities; however, they are not a perfect proxy for income and can be prone to bias in certain applications, particularly when studying tail outcomes (Chetty et al 2020). To evaluate the accuracy of our ZIP code imputation procedure, we compare our estimates to those of Cox et al (2020), who observe cardholder income directly based on checking account data for clients of JPMorgan Chase.…”

Changes in consumer behaviors and financial well-being during the coronavirus pandemic: results from the U.S. Household Pulse Survey

“…We do not directly observe cardholders' incomes in our data; instead, we proxy for cardholders' incomes using the median household income in the ZIP code in which they live (based on data from the 2014-18 American Community Survey). ZIP codes are strong predictors of income because of the degree of segregation in most American cities; however, they are not a perfect proxy for income and can be prone to bias in certain applications, particularly when studying tail outcomes (Chetty et al 2020). To evaluate the accuracy of our ZIP code imputation procedure, we compare our estimates to those in contemporaneous work by Cox et al (2020), who observe cardholder income directly based on checking account data for clients of JPMorgan Chase.…”